JRVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conifer Holdings has a net margin of -20.57% compared to James River Group Holdings's net margin of -14.12%. James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25% beat Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39%.

James River Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.15, signalling upside risk potential of 58.61%. On the other hand Conifer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -42.45%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.576% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.716%.

James River Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Conifer Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. James River Group Holdings pays -18% of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are larger than Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues of $16M. James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M is lower than Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M. Notably, James River Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conifer Holdings's PE ratio is 0.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for James River Group Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.15x for Conifer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -20.57% compared to James River Group Holdings's net margin of 40.78%. James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

James River Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.15, signalling upside risk potential of 58.61%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.42%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.576% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.485%.

James River Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. James River Group Holdings pays -18% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, James River Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for James River Group Holdings is 0.24x versus 3.72x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essent Group has a net margin of -20.57% compared to James River Group Holdings's net margin of 55.65%. James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25% beat Essent Group's return on equity of 14.09%.

James River Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.15, signalling upside risk potential of 58.61%. On the other hand Essent Group has an analysts' consensus of $64.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.56%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Essent Group, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Essent Group.

James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.576% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essent Group has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.678%.

James River Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Essent Group offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. James River Group Holdings pays -18% of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group pays out 15.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Essent Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Essent Group quarterly revenues of $316.6M. James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M is lower than Essent Group's net income of $176.2M. Notably, James River Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Essent Group's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for James River Group Holdings is 0.24x versus 4.72x for Essent Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a net margin of -20.57% compared to James River Group Holdings's net margin of 14.77%. James River Group Holdings's return on equity of -24.25% beat Fidelis Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 18.87%.

James River Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.15, signalling upside risk potential of 58.61%. On the other hand Fidelis Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.11 which suggests that it could grow by 30.6%. Given that James River Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fidelis Insurance Holdings, analysts believe James River Group Holdings is more attractive than Fidelis Insurance Holdings.

James River Group Holdings has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.576% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelis Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

James River Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Fidelis Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. James River Group Holdings pays -18% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelis Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

James River Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Fidelis Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $681.3M. James River Group Holdings's net income of -$39.4M is lower than Fidelis Insurance Holdings's net income of $100.6M. Notably, James River Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelis Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 4.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for James River Group Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.87x for Fidelis Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.