GBCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banc of California, Inc. has a net margin of 15.44% compared to Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 16.89%. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat Banc of California, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.56%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Banc of California, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.65 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that Banc of California, Inc. has higher upside potential than Glacier Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Banc of California, Inc. is more attractive than Glacier Bancorp, Inc..

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banc of California, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.581%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Banc of California, Inc. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. pays 66.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Banc of California, Inc. pays out 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $413.1M, which are smaller than Banc of California, Inc. quarterly revenues of $458.2M. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $63.8M is lower than Banc of California, Inc.'s net income of $77.4M. Notably, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Banc of California, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. is 4.44x versus 1.87x for Banc of California, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old National Bancorp has a net margin of 15.44% compared to Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 21.48%. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat Old National Bancorp's return on equity of 11.61%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Old National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $27.42 which suggests that it could grow by 6.8%. Given that Old National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Glacier Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Old National Bancorp is more attractive than Glacier Bancorp, Inc..

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old National Bancorp has a beta of 0.843, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.745%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Old National Bancorp offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. pays 66.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Old National Bancorp pays out 31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $413.1M, which are smaller than Old National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $1B. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $63.8M is lower than Old National Bancorp's net income of $216.6M. Notably, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Old National Bancorp's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. is 4.44x versus 2.51x for Old National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial Corp. has a net margin of 15.44% compared to Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 19.84%. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat UMB Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 10.76%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand UMB Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $145.42 which suggests that it could grow by 8.26%. Given that UMB Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Glacier Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe UMB Financial Corp. is more attractive than Glacier Bancorp, Inc..

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.787, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.277%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. UMB Financial Corp. offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. pays 66.33% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial Corp. pays out 17.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $413.1M, which are smaller than UMB Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $63.8M is lower than UMB Financial Corp.'s net income of $215.4M. Notably, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while UMB Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. is 4.44x versus 2.40x for UMB Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 15.44% compared to Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net margin of 21.9%. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 7.87%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a consensus price target of $56.80, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $14.68 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Valley National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Glacier Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Valley National Bancorp is more attractive than Glacier Bancorp, Inc..

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.228%.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Glacier Bancorp, Inc. pays 66.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Glacier Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues are $413.1M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $892.2M. Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $63.8M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $195.4M. Notably, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.68x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. is 4.44x versus 2.21x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.