FND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Floor & Decor Holdings's net margin of 7.97%. Floor & Decor Holdings's return on equity of 9.72% beat Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 21.4%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.83, signalling upside risk potential of 11.5%. On the other hand Academy Sports and Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $55.28 which suggests that it could grow by 37.3%. Given that Academy Sports and Outdoors has higher upside potential than Floor & Decor Holdings, analysts believe Academy Sports and Outdoors is more attractive than Floor & Decor Holdings.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Academy Sports and Outdoors offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Floor & Decor Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays out 7.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Floor & Decor Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Floor & Decor Holdings's net income of $48.9M is lower than Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $133.6M. Notably, Floor & Decor Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.78x while Academy Sports and Outdoors's PE ratio is 6.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Floor & Decor Holdings is 1.80x versus 0.50x for Academy Sports and Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genuine Parts has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Floor & Decor Holdings's net margin of 3.31%. Floor & Decor Holdings's return on equity of 9.72% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 18.88%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.83, signalling upside risk potential of 11.5%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $131.35 which suggests that it could grow by 11.71%. Given that Genuine Parts has higher upside potential than Floor & Decor Holdings, analysts believe Genuine Parts is more attractive than Floor & Decor Holdings.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.055%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Floor & Decor Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 61.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Floor & Decor Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Floor & Decor Holdings's net income of $48.9M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $194.4M. Notably, Floor & Decor Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.78x while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Floor & Decor Holdings is 1.80x versus 0.70x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Installed Building Products has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Floor & Decor Holdings's net margin of 8.92%. Floor & Decor Holdings's return on equity of 9.72% beat Installed Building Products's return on equity of 37.12%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.83, signalling upside risk potential of 11.5%. On the other hand Installed Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $190.90 which suggests that it could grow by 17.6%. Given that Installed Building Products has higher upside potential than Floor & Decor Holdings, analysts believe Installed Building Products is more attractive than Floor & Decor Holdings.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Installed Building Products has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.971%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Installed Building Products offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.07 per share. Floor & Decor Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Installed Building Products pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Installed Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Floor & Decor Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Installed Building Products quarterly revenues of $750.2M. Floor & Decor Holdings's net income of $48.9M is lower than Installed Building Products's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Floor & Decor Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.78x while Installed Building Products's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Floor & Decor Holdings is 1.80x versus 1.56x for Installed Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Floor & Decor Holdings's net margin of 1.5%. Floor & Decor Holdings's return on equity of 9.72% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.83, signalling upside risk potential of 11.5%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $83.88 which suggests that it could grow by 26.04%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Floor & Decor Holdings, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Floor & Decor Holdings.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

Floor & Decor Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Floor & Decor Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Floor & Decor Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Floor & Decor Holdings's net income of $48.9M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Floor & Decor Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.78x while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Floor & Decor Holdings is 1.80x versus 0.39x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.