FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 24.04%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,146.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.79%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.44%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.93x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.21x versus 6.61x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 0.54%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,146.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.79%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.44 which suggests that it could grow by 252.33%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.93x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.21x versus 0.68x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -13.16%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Ncino's return on equity of -3.51%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,146.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.79%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $25.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.9%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Ncino's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.93x while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.21x versus 5.12x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 26.28%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,146.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.79%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $235.31 which suggests that it could fall by -6.88%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Paycom Software, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Paycom Software.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.588%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.93x while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 36.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.21x versus 7.43x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.