FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -9.99%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,143.12, signalling upside risk potential of 38.78%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $479.74 which suggests that it could grow by 0.27%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.511% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.732%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.50x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 20.86x versus 28.69x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 3.24%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,143.12, signalling upside risk potential of 38.78%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $141.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3.27%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Datadog.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.511% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.629%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.50x while Datadog's PE ratio is 298.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 20.86x versus 17.45x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 36.86%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,143.12, signalling upside risk potential of 38.78%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $530.38 which suggests that it could grow by 5.38%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Microsoft.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.511% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.50x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 38.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 20.86x versus 13.92x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 3.04%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,143.12, signalling upside risk potential of 38.78%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.71%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Workday.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.511% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.50x while Workday's PE ratio is 126.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 20.86x versus 7.10x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.