Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
47
FBIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.01
Seasonality move
:
1.16%
Day range:
$50.45 - $51.32
52-week range:
$44.04 - $75.82
Dividend yield:
1.96%
P/E ratio:
19.06x
P/S ratio:
1.39x
P/B ratio:
2.58x
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
-25.58%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$2.68
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $0.75 | 2.87% | 19.47% | $62.56 |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$5.3M | -$0.09 | -22.15% | -110.08% | $15.00 |
|
XYL
Xylem, Inc.
|
$2.2B | $1.16 | 5.25% | 5.44% | $167.41 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
|
$51.02 | $62.56 | $6.1B | 19.06x | $0.25 | 1.96% | 1.39x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
|
$12.86 | -- | $12.4M | -- | $0.03 | 0.93% | 0.48x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
|
$3.36 | -- | $44.3M | 18.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.60x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
|
$0.26 | -- | $89.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$5.04 | $15.00 | $150.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.70x |
|
XYL
Xylem, Inc.
|
$138.07 | $167.41 | $33.6B | 35.52x | $0.40 | 1.16% | 3.79x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
|
54.37% | 0.828 | 44.16% | 0.78x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
|
4.52% | 0.940 | 9.39% | 2.97x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
|
51.01% | 0.988 | 79.5% | 1.57x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
|
63.81% | 11.641 | 155.29% | 0.46x |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
10.06% | 3.963 | 1.08% | 1.83x |
|
XYL
Xylem, Inc.
|
15.71% | 1.214 | 5.78% | 1.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
|
$507.2M | $206.3M | 6.19% | 13.83% | 17.95% | $177M |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
|
$1.3M | $64.6K | -16.63% | -17% | 0.88% | $492.1K |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
|
$4.3M | $1.8M | -1.18% | -2.26% | 9.11% | $211K |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
|
$6.3M | -$14.1M | -30.34% | -257.58% | -57.78% | -$20.3M |
|
TGEN
Tecogen, Inc.
|
$2.2M | -$2.1M | -32.68% | -41.73% | -29.22% | -$3.6M |
|
XYL
Xylem, Inc.
|
$878M | $352M | 7.13% | 8.53% | 15.54% | $281M |
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVR?
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.44.14% $0.59 $5.2B CVRChicago Rivet & Machine Co.18.06% $0.07 $21M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.4 12 0 CVRChicago Rivet & Machine Co.0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVR More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net income of $70.8M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.48x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.1.39x 19.06x $1.1B $70.8M CVRChicago Rivet & Machine Co.0.48x -- $7.4M $67.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVU?
CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net margin of 5.78%. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83% beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.44.14% $0.59 $5.2B CVUCPI Aerostructures, Inc.22.35% $0.09 $51M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, Inc., analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.4 12 0 CVUCPI Aerostructures, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVU More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.498%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net income of $70.8M is higher than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.60x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.1.39x 19.06x $1.1B $70.8M CVUCPI Aerostructures, Inc.0.60x 18.60x $19.3M $1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GPUS?
Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net margin of -55.83%. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83% beat Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity of -257.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.44.14% $0.59 $5.2B GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.25.75% -$0.39 $156.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 204201008.55%. Given that Hyperscale Data, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc., analysts believe Hyperscale Data, Inc. is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.4 12 0 GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GPUS More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data, Inc. has a beta of 2.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.109%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Hyperscale Data, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data, Inc. pays out 8.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.3M. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net income of $70.8M is higher than Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is 1.39x versus 0.04x for Hyperscale Data, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.1.39x 19.06x $1.1B $70.8M GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.0.04x -- $24.3M -$13.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or TGEN?
Tecogen, Inc. has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net margin of -29.5%. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83% beat Tecogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.44.14% $0.59 $5.2B TGENTecogen, Inc.30.4% -$0.07 $28.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or TGEN?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Tecogen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 197.62%. Given that Tecogen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc., analysts believe Tecogen, Inc. is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.4 12 0 TGENTecogen, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is FBIN or TGEN More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen, Inc. has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.097%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or TGEN?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Tecogen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or TGEN?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Tecogen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net income of $70.8M is higher than Tecogen, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Tecogen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is 1.39x versus 4.70x for Tecogen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.1.39x 19.06x $1.1B $70.8M TGENTecogen, Inc.4.70x -- $7.2M -$2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or XYL?
Xylem, Inc. has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net margin of 9.98%. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.83% beat Xylem, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.44.14% $0.59 $5.2B XYLXylem, Inc.38.76% $0.93 $13.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or XYL?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.62%. On the other hand Xylem, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $167.41 which suggests that it could grow by 21.25%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has higher upside potential than Xylem, Inc., analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is more attractive than Xylem, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.4 12 0 XYLXylem, Inc.10 8 0 -
Is FBIN or XYL More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem, Inc. has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.588%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or XYL?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Xylem, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem, Inc. pays out 39.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or XYL?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Xylem, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s net income of $70.8M is lower than Xylem, Inc.'s net income of $226M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.06x while Xylem, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is 1.39x versus 3.79x for Xylem, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.1.39x 19.06x $1.1B $70.8M XYLXylem, Inc.3.79x 35.52x $2.3B $226M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
