Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
33
FBIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$69.82
Seasonality move
:
2.41%
Day range:
$68.84 - $69.78
52-week range:
$62.54 - $90.54
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
19.62x
P/S ratio:
1.88x
P/B ratio:
3.61x
Volume:
771.6K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-9.9%
Market cap:
$8.7B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$1.2B | $1.14 | -0.94% | 65.39% | $89.87 |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GENC
Gencor Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$69.65 | $89.87 | $8.7B | 19.62x | $0.24 | 1.38% | 1.88x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$15.50 | -- | $15M | -- | $0.03 | 2.13% | 0.50x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$3.86 | -- | $50.2M | 2.82x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$27.90 | -- | $77.9M | 11.34x | $0.25 | 3.14% | 1.76x |
|
GENC
Gencor Industries
|
$17.77 | -- | $260.5M | 16.15x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.30x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$5.36 | -- | $5.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
53.69% | 0.901 | 24.94% | 0.59x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | -0.532 | -- | 2.68x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
42.08% | -0.476 | 40.73% | 1.55x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | -0.380 | -- | 2.01x |
|
GENC
Gencor Industries
|
-- | 0.870 | -- | 17.45x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
97.85% | 2.125 | 1339.66% | 0.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$529.8M | $212.5M | 8.71% | 19.45% | 17.89% | $175.6M |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$695K | -$823.6K | -13.89% | -13.89% | -11.82% | -$368.9K |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$4.2M | $1.5M | 43.19% | 84.62% | 7.61% | $586.9K |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$2.8M | $1.7M | 15.95% | 15.95% | 16.46% | $724.8K |
|
GENC
Gencor Industries
|
$6.1M | $2M | 8.69% | 8.69% | 7.8% | -$1.4M |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$8.5M | -$12.8M | -108.68% | -281.97% | -77.39% | $2.8M |
Fortune Brands Innovations vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVR?
Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -20.76%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B CVRChicago Rivet & Machine9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $89.87, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVR More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.470, which suggesting that the stock is 47.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.839%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.50x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.62x $1.2B $136.6M CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0.50x -- $7M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVU?
CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 3.86%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B CVUCPI Aerostructures21.73% $0.06 $43.1M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $89.87, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 CVUCPI Aerostructures0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVU More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.470, which suggesting that the stock is 47.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.743, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.291%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 2.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.58x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.62x $1.2B $136.6M CVUCPI Aerostructures0.58x 2.82x $19.4M $749.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or ESP?
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 15.31%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics26.82% $0.61 $42.5M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $89.87, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.39%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or ESP More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.470, which suggesting that the stock is 47.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 11.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 1.76x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.62x $1.2B $136.6M ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics1.76x 11.34x $10.4M $1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GENC?
Gencor Industries has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 10.01%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Gencor Industries's return on equity of 8.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B GENCGencor Industries23.9% $0.17 $194.7M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GENC?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $89.87, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Gencor Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -48.42%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Gencor Industries, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Gencor Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 GENCGencor Industries0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GENC More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.470, which suggesting that the stock is 47.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gencor Industries has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.953%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GENC?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Gencor Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Gencor Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GENC?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Gencor Industries quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Gencor Industries's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Gencor Industries's PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 2.30x for Gencor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.62x $1.2B $136.6M GENCGencor Industries2.30x 16.15x $25.6M $2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GPUS?
Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 11.82% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -82.25%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations45.86% $1.09 $5.2B GPUSHyperscale Data27.51% -$24.85 $126.9M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $89.87, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9794695.71%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations4 12 0 GPUSHyperscale Data0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GPUS More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.470, which suggesting that the stock is 47.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.62x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.88x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.88x 19.62x $1.2B $136.6M GPUSHyperscale Data0.03x -- $31.1M -$25.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
