DBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.14%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 152.53%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 81.00x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -21.4%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.75%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.14%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.46%. Given that Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Johnson Outdoors, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.934%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. pays out 50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.8M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is higher than Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s net income of -$29.1M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.76x for Johnson Outdoors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann Corp. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -248.19%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Northann Corp.'s return on equity of -204.71%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.14%. On the other hand Northann Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Designer Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northann Corp., analysts believe Designer Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Northann Corp..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Northann Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Northann Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is higher than Northann Corp.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Northann Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.21x for Northann Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 3.27%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.14%. On the other hand Steven Madden Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $46.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.87%. Given that Steven Madden Ltd. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Steven Madden Ltd. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.552%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Steven Madden Ltd. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd. pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues of $667.9M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is lower than Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Steven Madden Ltd.'s PE ratio is 54.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 1.29x for Steven Madden Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.