DBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 18.85%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.15% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 41.28%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.85%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.97 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that Deckers Outdoor Corp. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Deckers Outdoor Corp. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.76%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $739.8M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $11.3M is lower than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $268.2M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.08x versus 2.76x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 6.2%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.15% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.85%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $739.8M, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $11.3M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.08x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocky Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 5.89%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.15% beat Rocky Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.7%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.85%. On the other hand Rocky Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.74%. Given that Rocky Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Rocky Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Brands, Inc. has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.898%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Rocky Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands, Inc. pays out 40.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $739.8M, which are larger than Rocky Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $122.5M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $11.3M is higher than Rocky Brands, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Rocky Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.48x for Rocky Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 3.27%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.15% beat Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.85%. On the other hand Steven Madden Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could fall by -0.82%. Given that Designer Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe Designer Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.552%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Steven Madden Ltd. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd. pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $739.8M, which are larger than Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues of $667.9M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $11.3M is lower than Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Steven Madden Ltd.'s PE ratio is 56.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.08x versus 1.33x for Steven Madden Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.