DBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Holley, Inc. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -0.58%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Holley, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.71%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.1%. On the other hand Holley, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.13 which suggests that it could grow by 19.74%. Given that Holley, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Holley, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holley, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.52%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Holley, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Holley, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Holley, Inc. quarterly revenues of $138.4M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is higher than Holley, Inc.'s net income of -$806K. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Holley, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.85x for Holley, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -2.34%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.15%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.1%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.91%. Given that Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Johnson Outdoors, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.967%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors, Inc. pays out 50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Designer Brands, Inc.'s is not.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $140.9M. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is higher than Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Johnson Outdoors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 89.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.80x for Johnson Outdoors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Designer Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Designer Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.45% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.25, signalling downside risk potential of -4.1%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.41%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, Inc., analysts believe Tesla, Inc. is more attractive than Designer Brands, Inc..

Designer Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.331% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.

Designer Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands, Inc. pays 104.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $752.4M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Designer Brands, Inc.'s net income of $19.3M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Designer Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 382.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands, Inc. is 0.13x versus 15.31x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.