CWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

America's Car-Mart has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 1.47%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat America's Car-Mart's return on equity of -0.82%.

Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand America's Car-Mart has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.02%. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than America's Car-Mart, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than America's Car-Mart.

Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America's Car-Mart has a beta of 1.679, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.

Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. America's Car-Mart offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. America's Car-Mart pays out -0.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than America's Car-Mart quarterly revenues of $347.3M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than America's Car-Mart's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while America's Car-Mart's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.27x for America's Car-Mart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazydays Holdings has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of -8.28%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat Lazydays Holdings's return on equity of -95.45%.

Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand Lazydays Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1104.82%. Given that Lazydays Holdings has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, analysts believe Lazydays Holdings is more attractive than Camping World Holdings.

Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazydays Holdings has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.132%.

Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Lazydays Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazydays Holdings pays out -4.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Lazydays Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.5M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than Lazydays Holdings's net income of -$17.7M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lazydays Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.01x for Lazydays Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarineMax has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 0.71%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat MarineMax's return on equity of 4%.

Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand MarineMax has an analysts' consensus of $39.63 which suggests that it could grow by 39.77%. Given that MarineMax has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, analysts believe MarineMax is more attractive than Camping World Holdings.

Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarineMax has a beta of 1.866, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.554%.

Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. MarineMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MarineMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than MarineMax quarterly revenues of $563.1M. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than MarineMax's net income of $4M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarineMax's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.27x for MarineMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Camping World Holdings's net margin of 2.27%. Camping World Holdings's return on equity of -12.2% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.55%.

Camping World Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.82%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $397.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Camping World Holdings has higher upside potential than Lithia Motors, analysts believe Camping World Holdings is more attractive than Lithia Motors.

Camping World Holdings has a beta of 2.493, which suggesting that the stock is 149.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.095%.

Camping World Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Camping World Holdings pays 316.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 5.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Camping World Holdings's is not.

Camping World Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Camping World Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.1M. Notably, Camping World Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings is 0.27x versus 0.28x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.