How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
36
CWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.56
Seasonality move
:
-15.77%
Day range:
$12.81 - $13.46
52-week range:
$9.49 - $24.37
Dividend yield:
3.79%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.15x
P/B ratio:
2.80x
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
2.4M
1-year change:
-44.11%
Market cap:
$828.6M
Revenue:
$6.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.93
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.2B | -$0.47 | 3.17% | -48.12% | $17.58 |
|
BARK
BARK, Inc.
|
$102.6M | -$0.04 | -15.09% | -42.69% | $2.33 |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$700.6M | $0.86 | -12.92% | -71.46% | $6.00 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -3.45% | 75.59% | $31.50 |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$4B | $0.46 | 5.11% | 2.4% | $57.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
|
$13.19 | $17.58 | $828.6M | -- | $0.13 | 3.79% | 0.15x |
|
BARK
BARK, Inc.
|
$0.89 | $2.33 | $152.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$4.32 | $6.00 | $276.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.17x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$28.00 | $31.50 | $843.3M | 300.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$50.88 | $57.78 | $26.9B | 24.69x | $0.23 | 1.81% | 1.74x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
|
92.73% | 3.694 | 320.57% | 0.23x |
|
BARK
BARK, Inc.
|
48.85% | 1.635 | 57.93% | 0.67x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
47.08% | 0.312 | 102.36% | 0.76x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.496 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
69.72% | 0.252 | 22.49% | 0.07x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
|
$491.4M | $80.4M | -1.35% | -12.98% | 4.45% | $105.4M |
|
BARK
BARK, Inc.
|
$59.4M | -$9.7M | -18.76% | -34.15% | -9.08% | -$19.9M |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$281.9M | $74.3M | -34.85% | -66.91% | 10.59% | $302.2M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$1.2B | $297.7M | 13.51% | 45.09% | 7.64% | $59.3M |
Camping World Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or BARK?
BARK, Inc. has a net margin of -1.63% compared to Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -9.98%. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.98% beat BARK, Inc.'s return on equity of -34.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.27.21% -$0.64 $4.3B BARKBARK, Inc.55.51% -$0.06 $169M -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or BARK?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.58, signalling upside risk potential of 33.31%. On the other hand BARK, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 162.17%. Given that BARK, Inc. has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, Inc., analysts believe BARK, Inc. is more attractive than Camping World Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.8 2 0 BARKBARK, Inc.2 1 0 -
Is CWH or BARK More Risky?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.086, which suggesting that the stock is 108.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BARK, Inc. has a beta of 1.897, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.719%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or BARK?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. BARK, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings, Inc. pays 31.38% of its earnings as a dividend. BARK, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or BARK?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than BARK, Inc. quarterly revenues of $107M. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$29.4M is lower than BARK, Inc.'s net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BARK, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.34x for BARK, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.0.15x -- $1.8B -$29.4M BARKBARK, Inc.0.34x -- $107M -$10.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or FLWS?
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of -1.63% compared to Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.05%. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.98% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.27.21% -$0.64 $4.3B FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.40.15% $1.10 $547.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or FLWS?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.58, signalling upside risk potential of 33.31%. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.89%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Camping World Holdings, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Camping World Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.8 2 0 FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is CWH or FLWS More Risky?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.086, which suggesting that the stock is 108.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.75%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or FLWS?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings, Inc. pays 31.38% of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or FLWS?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $702.2M. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$29.4M is lower than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of $70.6M. Notably, Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.17x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.0.15x -- $1.8B -$29.4M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0.17x -- $702.2M $70.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or ODP?
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of -1.63% compared to Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.98% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.27.21% -$0.64 $4.3B ODPThe ODP Corp.20.37% $0.77 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or ODP?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.58, signalling upside risk potential of 33.31%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Camping World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The ODP Corp., analysts believe Camping World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The ODP Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.8 2 0 ODPThe ODP Corp.0 1 0 -
Is CWH or ODP More Risky?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.086, which suggesting that the stock is 108.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or ODP?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Camping World Holdings, Inc. pays 31.38% of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or ODP?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$29.4M is lower than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings, Inc. is 0.15x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.0.15x -- $1.8B -$29.4M ODPThe ODP Corp.0.13x 300.11x $1.6B $23M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWH or TSCO?
Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of -1.63% compared to Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.83%. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.98% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 45.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.27.21% -$0.64 $4.3B TSCOTractor Supply Co.31.86% $0.43 $8.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CWH or TSCO?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.58, signalling upside risk potential of 33.31%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $57.78 which suggests that it could grow by 14.52%. Given that Camping World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply Co., analysts believe Camping World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Tractor Supply Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.8 2 0 TSCOTractor Supply Co.14 14 0 -
Is CWH or TSCO More Risky?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.086, which suggesting that the stock is 108.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.645%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWH or TSCO?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Camping World Holdings, Inc. pays 31.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 44.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWH or TSCO?
Camping World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$29.4M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $227.4M. Notably, Camping World Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Camping World Holdings, Inc. is 0.15x versus 1.74x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWHCamping World Holdings, Inc.0.15x -- $1.8B -$29.4M TSCOTractor Supply Co.1.74x 24.69x $3.9B $227.4M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Feb 2
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 3.19% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Feb 2
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 6.56% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Feb 2
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 8.78% over the past day.
