Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Sell
50
CWAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.13
Seasonality move
:
-10.02%
Day range:
$24.08 - $24.19
52-week range:
$15.74 - $32.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
15.77x
P/S ratio:
10.01x
P/B ratio:
3.57x
Volume:
6.8M
Avg. volume:
12.2M
1-year change:
-11.48%
Market cap:
$7.1B
Revenue:
$451.8M
EPS (TTM):
$1.53
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
|
$216.7M | $0.15 | 71.36% | -90.86% | $27.89 |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
|
$237.7M | $0.38 | 16.01% | 96.85% | $54.00 |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
|
$1.4B | $3.16 | 11.31% | 75.52% | $216.39 |
|
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
|
$1.8B | $0.32 | 13.37% | 115.45% | $24.21 |
|
TOST
Toast, Inc.
|
$1.6B | $0.24 | 20.94% | 333.8% | $47.75 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
|
$24.13 | $27.89 | $7.1B | 15.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 10.01x |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
|
$53.20 | $54.00 | $4.9B | 21.59x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.20x |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
|
$211.93 | $216.39 | $11.7B | 32.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.27x |
|
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
|
$19.21 | $24.21 | $7.7B | 53.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.28x |
|
TOST
Toast, Inc.
|
$36.62 | $47.75 | $21.5B | 83.99x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.78x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
|
30.82% | 0.231 | 16.67% | 1.72x |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
|
104.51% | 1.521 | 51.68% | 1.01x |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
|
4% | 1.887 | 1.86% | 2.84x |
|
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
|
69.71% | 2.564 | 14.93% | 0.48x |
|
TOST
Toast, Inc.
|
0.89% | 1.683 | 0.08% | 2.18x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
|
$134.5M | $7.1M | 22.72% | 29.67% | 3.46% | $44.9M |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCN
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
|
$136.9M | $44.9M | 16.64% | -- | 19.57% | $89M |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
|
$372.4M | $137.7M | 9.77% | 10.2% | 9.87% | $286.4M |
|
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
|
$626.6M | $23.1M | 8% | 21.13% | 1.37% | $277.8M |
|
TOST
Toast, Inc.
|
$432M | $84M | 15.93% | 16.18% | 5.14% | $153M |
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or CRWV?
CoreWeave has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.67% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.65.56% -$0.04 $2.9B CRWVCoreWeave-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or CRWV?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.89, signalling upside risk potential of 15.57%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.2 5 0 CRWVCoreWeave0 0 0 -
Is CWAN or CRWV More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or CRWV?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or CRWV?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $205.1M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is 10.01x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.10.01x 15.77x $205.1M -$10.5M CRWVCoreWeave-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or DOCN?
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 68.97%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.67% beat DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.65.56% -$0.04 $2.9B DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.59.63% $1.51 $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or DOCN?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.89, signalling upside risk potential of 15.57%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.5%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.2 5 0 DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.6 5 0 -
Is CWAN or DOCN More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or DOCN?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or DOCN?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $205.1M, which are smaller than DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $229.6M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5M is lower than DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $158.4M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is 10.01x versus 6.20x for DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.10.01x 15.77x $205.1M -$10.5M DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.6.20x 21.59x $229.6M $158.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or EPAM?
EPAM Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.66%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.67% beat EPAM Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.65.56% -$0.04 $2.9B EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.26.71% $1.91 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.89, signalling upside risk potential of 15.57%. On the other hand EPAM Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $216.39 which suggests that it could grow by 2.1%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, Inc., analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than EPAM Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.2 5 0 EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.10 6 0 -
Is CWAN or EPAM More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.609%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $205.1M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5M is lower than EPAM Systems, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while EPAM Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is 10.01x versus 2.27x for EPAM Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.10.01x 15.77x $205.1M -$10.5M EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.2.27x 32.34x $1.4B $106.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or LYFT?
Lyft, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.73%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.67% beat Lyft, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.65.56% -$0.04 $2.9B LYFTLyft, Inc.37.18% $0.11 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or LYFT?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.89, signalling upside risk potential of 15.57%. On the other hand Lyft, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.21 which suggests that it could grow by 26.04%. Given that Lyft, Inc. has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Lyft, Inc. is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.2 5 0 LYFTLyft, Inc.10 30 1 -
Is CWAN or LYFT More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lyft, Inc. has a beta of 1.943, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.267%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or LYFT?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lyft, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lyft, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or LYFT?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $205.1M, which are smaller than Lyft, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5M is lower than Lyft, Inc.'s net income of $46.1M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Lyft, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is 10.01x versus 1.28x for Lyft, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.10.01x 15.77x $205.1M -$10.5M LYFTLyft, Inc.1.28x 53.27x $1.7B $46.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or TOST?
Toast, Inc. has a net margin of -5.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.43%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.67% beat Toast, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.65.56% -$0.04 $2.9B TOSTToast, Inc.26.45% $0.16 $2B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or TOST?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.89, signalling upside risk potential of 15.57%. On the other hand Toast, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.75 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that Toast, Inc. has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Toast, Inc. is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.2 5 0 TOSTToast, Inc.14 11 0 -
Is CWAN or TOST More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or TOST?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or TOST?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $205.1M, which are smaller than Toast, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5M is lower than Toast, Inc.'s net income of $105M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Toast, Inc.'s PE ratio is 83.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is 10.01x versus 3.78x for Toast, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.10.01x 15.77x $205.1M -$10.5M TOSTToast, Inc.3.78x 83.99x $1.6B $105M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.
Sell
50
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
