CVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -17.43%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -62.29%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.83, signalling downside risk potential of -9.15%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.92%. Given that Delek US Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Delek US Holdings is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.248%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.16%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.4B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$413.8M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 363.83x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.29x versus 0.09x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -3.91%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.83, signalling downside risk potential of -9.15%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.28%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.379%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.16%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 31.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.5B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 363.83x while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.29x versus 0.45x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of -3.94%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -8.52%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.83, signalling downside risk potential of -9.15%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $24.31 which suggests that it could grow by 10.59%. Given that PBF Energy has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe PBF Energy is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.721%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.16%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out -22.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$289.3M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 363.83x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.29x versus 0.08x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 1.49% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 0.02%. CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

CVR Energy has a consensus price target of $19.83, signalling downside risk potential of -9.15%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $138.97 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than CVR Energy.

CVR Energy has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.044% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

CVR Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.16%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. CVR Energy pays 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CVR Energy's is not.

CVR Energy quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. CVR Energy's net income of $29M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, CVR Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 363.83x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 26.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVR Energy is 0.29x versus 0.38x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.