CTVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of -10.69%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 50.16%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.34x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.78x versus 0.18x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of 9.09%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.09%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $34.59 which suggests that it could grow by 5.87%. Given that The Mosaic has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe The Mosaic is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.211%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 154.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Mosaic's is not.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than The Mosaic's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.34x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 28.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.78x versus 0.94x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of 1.99%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 27.35%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.34x while Nucor's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.78x versus 0.89x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of 4.97%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 5.11%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.34x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.78x versus 1.17x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.