CRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of 34.86%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $55.31, signalling upside risk potential of 36.29%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.86%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. California Resources's net income of $115M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.36x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.06x versus 2.59x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of 11.47%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $55.31, signalling upside risk potential of 36.29%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $39.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.255%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $846.3M. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $97.1M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.36x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 33.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.06x versus 3.54x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talos Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of -1.92%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Talos Energy's return on equity of 0.95%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $55.31, signalling upside risk potential of 36.29%. On the other hand Talos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 59.26%. Given that Talos Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Talos Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talos Energy has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.043%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Talos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Talos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Talos Energy quarterly revenues of $513.1M. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Talos Energy's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.36x while Talos Energy's PE ratio is 54.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.06x versus 0.71x for Talos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of 12.78% compared to California Resources's net margin of -67.26%. California Resources's return on equity of 17.04% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $55.31, signalling upside risk potential of 36.29%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $22.10 which suggests that it could grow by 37.7%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.635%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $900M, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $534.4M. California Resources's net income of $115M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.36x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.06x versus 0.30x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.