CPNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carvana has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Coupang's net margin of 2.23%. Coupang's return on equity of 3.74% beat Carvana's return on equity of 97.13%.

Coupang has a consensus price target of $29.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Carvana has an analysts' consensus of $265.56 which suggests that it could grow by 29.91%. Given that Coupang has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Coupang is more attractive than Carvana.

Coupang has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carvana has a beta of 3.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 256.418%.

Coupang has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carvana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coupang pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carvana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coupang quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Carvana quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Coupang's net income of $156M is higher than Carvana's net income of $79M. Notably, Coupang's price-to-earnings ratio is 270.20x while Carvana's PE ratio is 130.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coupang is 1.36x versus 2.30x for Carvana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Coupang's net margin of -9.68%. Coupang's return on equity of 3.74% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

Coupang has a consensus price target of $29.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 63.43%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Coupang, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Coupang.

Coupang has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.446%.

Coupang has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coupang pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coupang quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Coupang's net income of $156M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, Coupang's price-to-earnings ratio is 270.20x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coupang is 1.36x versus 3.64x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eBay has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Coupang's net margin of 26.33%. Coupang's return on equity of 3.74% beat eBay's return on equity of 34.32%.

Coupang has a consensus price target of $29.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand eBay has an analysts' consensus of $65.07 which suggests that it could fall by -3.11%. Given that Coupang has higher upside potential than eBay, analysts believe Coupang is more attractive than eBay.

Coupang has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eBay has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.97%.

Coupang has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eBay offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Coupang pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eBay pays out 26.99% of its earnings as a dividend. eBay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coupang quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than eBay quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Coupang's net income of $156M is lower than eBay's net income of $679M. Notably, Coupang's price-to-earnings ratio is 270.20x while eBay's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coupang is 1.36x versus 3.27x for eBay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Coupang's net margin of -4.1%. Coupang's return on equity of 3.74% beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

Coupang has a consensus price target of $29.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $54.79 which suggests that it could grow by 61.85%. Given that Wayfair has higher upside potential than Coupang, analysts believe Wayfair is more attractive than Coupang.

Coupang has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 3.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 244.36%.

Coupang has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coupang pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Coupang quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Coupang's net income of $156M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$128M. Notably, Coupang's price-to-earnings ratio is 270.20x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coupang is 1.36x versus 0.35x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.