CLCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DHT Holdings has a net margin of 10.38% compared to Cool's net margin of 24.77%. Cool's return on equity of 11.39% beat DHT Holdings's return on equity of 15.62%.

Cool has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.93%. On the other hand DHT Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.05%. Given that Cool has higher upside potential than DHT Holdings, analysts believe Cool is more attractive than DHT Holdings.

Cool has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DHT Holdings has a beta of -0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.766%.

Cool has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.7%. DHT Holdings offers a yield of 11.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Cool pays 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. DHT Holdings pays out 115.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Cool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but DHT Holdings's is not.

Cool quarterly revenues are $78.5M, which are smaller than DHT Holdings quarterly revenues of $142.1M. Cool's net income of $8.1M is lower than DHT Holdings's net income of $35.2M. Notably, Cool's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while DHT Holdings's PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cool is 1.19x versus 2.47x for DHT Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flex LNG has a net margin of 10.38% compared to Cool's net margin of 19.24%. Cool's return on equity of 11.39% beat Flex LNG's return on equity of 10.96%.

Cool has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.93%. On the other hand Flex LNG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Cool has higher upside potential than Flex LNG, analysts believe Cool is more attractive than Flex LNG.

Cool has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flex LNG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.027%.

Cool has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.7%. Flex LNG offers a yield of 14.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Cool pays 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Flex LNG pays out 150.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Cool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flex LNG's is not.

Cool quarterly revenues are $78.5M, which are smaller than Flex LNG quarterly revenues of $90.5M. Cool's net income of $8.1M is lower than Flex LNG's net income of $17.4M. Notably, Cool's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Flex LNG's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cool is 1.19x versus 3.18x for Flex LNG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 10.38% compared to Cool's net margin of -53.67%. Cool's return on equity of 11.39% beat Golar LNG's return on equity of 0.52%.

Cool has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.93%. On the other hand Golar LNG has an analysts' consensus of $46.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Cool has higher upside potential than Golar LNG, analysts believe Cool is more attractive than Golar LNG.

Cool has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golar LNG has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.509%.

Cool has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.7%. Golar LNG offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cool pays 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Golar LNG pays out -219.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cool quarterly revenues are $78.5M, which are larger than Golar LNG quarterly revenues of $64.8M. Cool's net income of $8.1M is higher than Golar LNG's net income of -$34.8M. Notably, Cool's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Golar LNG's PE ratio is 324.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cool is 1.19x versus 15.82x for Golar LNG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nabors Industries has a net margin of 10.38% compared to Cool's net margin of -7.63%. Cool's return on equity of 11.39% beat Nabors Industries's return on equity of -10.81%.

Cool has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 82.93%. On the other hand Nabors Industries has an analysts' consensus of $87.50 which suggests that it could grow by 62.73%. Given that Cool has higher upside potential than Nabors Industries, analysts believe Cool is more attractive than Nabors Industries.

Cool has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nabors Industries has a beta of 2.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.691%.

Cool has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.7%. Nabors Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cool pays 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Nabors Industries pays out -1.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Cool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cool quarterly revenues are $78.5M, which are smaller than Nabors Industries quarterly revenues of $731.8M. Cool's net income of $8.1M is higher than Nabors Industries's net income of -$55.8M. Notably, Cool's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.27x while Nabors Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cool is 1.19x versus 0.17x for Nabors Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.