CINT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enfusion has a net margin of 9.39% compared to CI&T's net margin of 0.23%. CI&T's return on equity of 10.27% beat Enfusion's return on equity of 3.17%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $8.23, signalling upside risk potential of 59.44%. On the other hand Enfusion has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.55%. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Enfusion.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enfusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enfusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are larger than Enfusion quarterly revenues of $52.9M. CI&T's net income of $10.6M is higher than Enfusion's net income of $121K. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Enfusion's PE ratio is 358.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.43x versus 6.38x for Enfusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PagSeguro Digital has a net margin of 9.39% compared to CI&T's net margin of 11.97%. CI&T's return on equity of 10.27% beat PagSeguro Digital's return on equity of 14.97%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $8.23, signalling upside risk potential of 59.44%. On the other hand PagSeguro Digital has an analysts' consensus of $10.62 which suggests that it could grow by 14.98%. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than PagSeguro Digital, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than PagSeguro Digital.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagSeguro Digital has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagSeguro Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagSeguro Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are smaller than PagSeguro Digital quarterly revenues of $856.3M. CI&T's net income of $10.6M is lower than PagSeguro Digital's net income of $102.5M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while PagSeguro Digital's PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.43x versus 0.87x for PagSeguro Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Totvs SA has a net margin of 9.39% compared to CI&T's net margin of 13.37%. CI&T's return on equity of 10.27% beat Totvs SA's return on equity of 14.02%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $8.23, signalling upside risk potential of 59.44%. On the other hand Totvs SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Totvs SA, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Totvs SA.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Totvs SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Totvs SA offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA pays out 36.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are smaller than Totvs SA quarterly revenues of $236.9M. CI&T's net income of $10.6M is lower than Totvs SA's net income of $31.7M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Totvs SA's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.43x versus 3.97x for Totvs SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zenvia has a net margin of 9.39% compared to CI&T's net margin of 18.5%. CI&T's return on equity of 10.27% beat Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $8.23, signalling upside risk potential of 59.44%. On the other hand Zenvia has an analysts' consensus of $1.71 which suggests that it could grow by 31.4%. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Zenvia.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zenvia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zenvia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are larger than Zenvia quarterly revenues of $51.3M. CI&T's net income of $10.6M is higher than Zenvia's net income of $9.5M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Zenvia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.43x versus 0.34x for Zenvia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.