CINT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PagSeguro Digital has a net margin of 4.59% compared to CI&T's net margin of 23.5%. CI&T's return on equity of 8.18% beat PagSeguro Digital's return on equity of 14.61%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $7.53, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand PagSeguro Digital has an analysts' consensus of $15.94 which suggests that it could grow by 83.38%. Given that PagSeguro Digital has higher upside potential than CI&T, analysts believe PagSeguro Digital is more attractive than CI&T.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagSeguro Digital has a beta of 1.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.971%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagSeguro Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagSeguro Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.1M, which are smaller than PagSeguro Digital quarterly revenues of $407.3M. CI&T's net income of $5.1M is lower than PagSeguro Digital's net income of $95.7M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.91x while PagSeguro Digital's PE ratio is 5.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.98x versus 1.13x for PagSeguro Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rumble has a net margin of 4.59% compared to CI&T's net margin of -125.87%. CI&T's return on equity of 8.18% beat Rumble's return on equity of -59.7%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $7.53, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand Rumble has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.42%. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Rumble.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rumble has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rumble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rumble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.1M, which are larger than Rumble quarterly revenues of $25.1M. CI&T's net income of $5.1M is higher than Rumble's net income of -$31.5M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.91x while Rumble's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.98x versus 17.04x for Rumble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Totvs SA has a net margin of 4.59% compared to CI&T's net margin of 21.88%. CI&T's return on equity of 8.18% beat Totvs SA's return on equity of 12.67%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $7.53, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand Totvs SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Totvs SA, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Totvs SA.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Totvs SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Totvs SA offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA pays out 56.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.1M, which are smaller than Totvs SA quarterly revenues of $239.6M. CI&T's net income of $5.1M is lower than Totvs SA's net income of $52.4M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.91x while Totvs SA's PE ratio is 22.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.98x versus 2.77x for Totvs SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zenvia has a net margin of 4.59% compared to CI&T's net margin of 18.5%. CI&T's return on equity of 8.18% beat Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96%.

CI&T has a consensus price target of $7.53, signalling upside risk potential of 21.57%. On the other hand Zenvia has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could fall by -2.51%. Given that CI&T has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe CI&T is more attractive than Zenvia.

CI&T has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CI&T has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zenvia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CI&T pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zenvia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CI&T quarterly revenues are $112.1M, which are larger than Zenvia quarterly revenues of $51.3M. CI&T's net income of $5.1M is lower than Zenvia's net income of $9.5M. Notably, CI&T's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.91x while Zenvia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI&T is 1.98x versus 0.43x for Zenvia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.