Financhill
Buy
59

CCJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$42.44
Seasonality move :
7.31%
Day range:
$42.16 - $43.13
52-week range:
$35.43 - $62.55
Dividend yield:
0.27%
P/E ratio:
152.16x
P/S ratio:
8.12x
P/B ratio:
4.17x
Volume:
3.9M
Avg. volume:
4.5M
1-year change:
6.31%
Market cap:
$18.5B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.28

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CCJ
Cameco
$556.7M $0.21 31.2% 68.03% $58.48
GFR
Greenfire Resources
-- $0.24 -- 121.33% --
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
-- $0.03 -- -86.96% --
LEU
Centrus Energy
$121.9M $0.80 53.39% -54.19% $143.87
SPOWF
Strata Power
-- -- -- -- --
UEC
Uranium Energy
-- -- 35589.66% -- $10.64
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CCJ
Cameco
$42.47 $58.48 $18.5B 152.16x $0.11 0.27% 8.12x
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$4.97 -- $345.3M 9.54x $0.00 0% 0.61x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$4.76 -- $170.8M 48.80x $0.00 0% 0.25x
LEU
Centrus Energy
$76.38 $143.87 $1.3B 17.32x $0.00 0% 2.82x
SPOWF
Strata Power
$0.0061 -- $122.5K -- $0.00 0% --
UEC
Uranium Energy
$5.08 $10.64 $2.2B -- $0.00 0% 47.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CCJ
Cameco
16.76% 1.528 3.99% 0.80x
GFR
Greenfire Resources
29.36% 1.348 44.13% 0.49x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
63.73% -0.078 279.38% 0.49x
LEU
Centrus Energy
49.09% -1.320 13.93% 2.17x
SPOWF
Strata Power
-4.18% -2.980 6.1% 1.56x
UEC
Uranium Energy
-- 1.399 -- 4.10x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CCJ
Cameco
$177.8M $129M 2.2% 2.71% 13.46% $338.7M
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$73.3M $28.6M 3.5% 5.36% 38.37% -$28.5M
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$83.9M $6.8M 0.31% 0.79% -1.29% -$38.1M
LEU
Centrus Energy
$61.8M $45.4M 29.95% 96.19% 32.78% $57.2M
SPOWF
Strata Power
-- -$25.2K -- -- -48.57% --
UEC
Uranium Energy
$18.2M -$3.7M -8.09% -8.09% -22.86% -$10M

Cameco vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or GFR?

    Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Cameco's net margin of 30.43%. Cameco's return on equity of 2.71% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 5.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    21.1% $0.22 $5.3B
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    51.62% $0.60 $777.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $58.48, signalling upside risk potential of 37.69%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cameco has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Cameco is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    9 0 0
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    1 0 0
  • Is CCJ or GFR More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -43.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $842.9M, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $141.9M. Cameco's net income of $96.5M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $43.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.16x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 9.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 8.12x versus 0.61x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    8.12x 152.16x $842.9M $96.5M
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    0.61x 9.54x $141.9M $43.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or GTE?

    Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Cameco's net margin of -23.23%. Cameco's return on equity of 2.71% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 0.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    21.1% $0.22 $5.3B
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    56.95% -$1.10 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $58.48, signalling upside risk potential of 37.69%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 69.43%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Cameco, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Cameco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    9 0 0
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    1 2 0
  • Is CCJ or GTE More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.404%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $842.9M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $147.3M. Cameco's net income of $96.5M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$34.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.16x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 48.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 8.12x versus 0.25x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    8.12x 152.16x $842.9M $96.5M
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    0.25x 48.80x $147.3M -$34.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or LEU?

    Centrus Energy has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Cameco's net margin of 35.42%. Cameco's return on equity of 2.71% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 96.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    21.1% $0.22 $5.3B
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    40.77% $3.20 $317M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $58.48, signalling upside risk potential of 37.69%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $143.87 which suggests that it could grow by 88.36%. Given that Centrus Energy has higher upside potential than Cameco, analysts believe Centrus Energy is more attractive than Cameco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    9 0 0
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    3 2 0
  • Is CCJ or LEU More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.25%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $842.9M, which are larger than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $151.6M. Cameco's net income of $96.5M is higher than Centrus Energy's net income of $53.7M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.16x while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 8.12x versus 2.82x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    8.12x 152.16x $842.9M $96.5M
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    2.82x 17.32x $151.6M $53.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or SPOWF?

    Strata Power has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Cameco's net margin of -48.93%. Cameco's return on equity of 2.71% beat Strata Power's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    21.1% $0.22 $5.3B
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    -- -$0.00 -$222.9K
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $58.48, signalling upside risk potential of 37.69%. On the other hand Strata Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cameco has higher upside potential than Strata Power, analysts believe Cameco is more attractive than Strata Power.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    9 0 0
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    0 0 0
  • Is CCJ or SPOWF More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power has a beta of 2.993, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.337%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Strata Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $842.9M, which are larger than Strata Power quarterly revenues of $37.9K. Cameco's net income of $96.5M is higher than Strata Power's net income of -$18.5K. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.16x while Strata Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 8.12x versus -- for Strata Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    8.12x 152.16x $842.9M $96.5M
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    -- -- $37.9K -$18.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or UEC?

    Uranium Energy has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Cameco's net margin of -20.57%. Cameco's return on equity of 2.71% beat Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    21.1% $0.22 $5.3B
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    36.64% -$0.02 $877.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $58.48, signalling upside risk potential of 37.69%. On the other hand Uranium Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.64 which suggests that it could grow by 109.51%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Cameco, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Cameco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    9 0 0
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    3 0 0
  • Is CCJ or UEC More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.655%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Uranium Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Uranium Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $842.9M, which are larger than Uranium Energy quarterly revenues of $49.8M. Cameco's net income of $96.5M is higher than Uranium Energy's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.16x while Uranium Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 8.12x versus 47.17x for Uranium Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    8.12x 152.16x $842.9M $96.5M
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    47.17x -- $49.8M -$10.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?

When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…

Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?
Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) share price has been on the proverbial ropes…

Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?
Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?

Chip giant QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) was the ultimate chip company…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15

Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.

Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 15

Semtech [SMTC] is up 21.28% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock