UEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Noble Corp. Plc has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy Corp.'s net margin of 11.33%. Uranium Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -7.96% beat Noble Corp. Plc's return on equity of 4.71%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Noble Corp. Plc has an analysts' consensus of $39.60 which suggests that it could fall by -18.6%. Given that Uranium Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Noble Corp. Plc, analysts believe Uranium Energy Corp. is more attractive than Noble Corp. Plc.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp. Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noble Corp. Plc offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Uranium Energy Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp. Plc pays out 147.84% of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Noble Corp. Plc quarterly revenues of $764.4M. Uranium Energy Corp.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Noble Corp. Plc's net income of $86.6M. Notably, Uranium Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noble Corp. Plc's PE ratio is 34.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy Corp. is 137.49x versus 2.24x for Noble Corp. Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy Corp.'s net margin of 6.01%. Uranium Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -7.96% beat National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s return on equity of 7.63%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.14 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that Uranium Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than National Energy Services Reunited Corp., analysts believe Uranium Energy Corp. is more attractive than National Energy Services Reunited Corp..

Uranium Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a beta of 0.250, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.034%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than National Energy Services Reunited Corp. quarterly revenues of $295.3M. Uranium Energy Corp.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Uranium Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy Corp. is 137.49x versus 1.61x for National Energy Services Reunited Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy Corp.'s net margin of -0.8%. Uranium Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -7.96% beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.78%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.16 which suggests that it could grow by 0.75%. Given that Uranium Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., analysts believe Uranium Energy Corp. is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc..

Uranium Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.409%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Uranium Energy Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uranium Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Uranium Energy Corp.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Uranium Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy Corp. is 137.49x versus 0.64x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB Ltd. has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy Corp.'s net margin of 8.22%. Uranium Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -7.96% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.52%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $19.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.14%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $54.58 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that Uranium Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than SLB Ltd., analysts believe Uranium Energy Corp. is more attractive than SLB Ltd..

Uranium Energy Corp. has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.443%.

Uranium Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Uranium Energy Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uranium Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Uranium Energy Corp.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $800M. Notably, Uranium Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy Corp. is 137.49x versus 2.03x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.