ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of -1491.89%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1953.39%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.839%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 436.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.65x versus 121.23x for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 6.74%. Given that Proto Labs, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe Proto Labs, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.003%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.65x versus 2.49x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of --. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2915.08%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.095%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.65x versus 0.04x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of 1.37%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.65 which suggests that it could grow by 15.74%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.385%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.61x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.65x versus 0.75x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.