ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of 4.95%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand Kennametal, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.25 which suggests that it could fall by -13.76%. Given that ATI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe ATI, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.413%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal, Inc. offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc. pays out 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues of $498M. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.71x while Kennametal, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.66x versus 1.14x for Kennametal, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Proto Labs, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe Proto Labs, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.003%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.71x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.66x versus 2.47x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of --. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2915.08%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.095%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.71x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.66x versus 0.04x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 10.09% compared to ATI, Inc.'s net margin of 1.37%. ATI, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

ATI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $121.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.65 which suggests that it could grow by 14.96%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than ATI, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than ATI, Inc..

ATI, Inc. has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.385%.

ATI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. ATI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. ATI, Inc.'s net income of $113.6M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, ATI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.71x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI, Inc. is 3.66x versus 0.75x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.