ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of 7.87% compared to ATI's net margin of -139.24%. ATI's return on equity of 24.8% beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $71.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.54%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4832.18%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.54%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $316K. ATI's net income of $82.7M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.58x while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.95x versus 36.57x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 7.87% compared to ATI's net margin of 5.72%. ATI's return on equity of 24.8% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 3.49%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $71.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.54%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -3.32%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Proto Labs.

ATI has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.581%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $125.6M. ATI's net income of $82.7M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $7.2M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.58x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 42.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.95x versus 2.01x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 7.87% compared to ATI's net margin of --. ATI's return on equity of 24.8% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

ATI has a consensus price target of $71.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.54%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6182.72%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.112%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. ATI's net income of $82.7M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.58x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.95x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 7.87% compared to ATI's net margin of 2.43%. ATI's return on equity of 24.8% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $71.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.54%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $104.02 which suggests that it could grow by 28.81%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.002%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.8B. ATI's net income of $82.7M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.58x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 1.95x versus 0.79x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.