ATHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ZW Data Action Technologies has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of -59.09%. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat ZW Data Action Technologies's return on equity of -81.18%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.86%. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, analysts believe Autohome is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.653%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.53%. ZW Data Action Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than ZW Data Action Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than ZW Data Action Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while ZW Data Action Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.21x versus 0.16x for ZW Data Action Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hello Group has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of 16.8%. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat Hello Group's return on equity of 11.27%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.86%. On the other hand Hello Group has an analysts' consensus of $7.99 which suggests that it could grow by 8.76%. Given that Autohome has higher upside potential than Hello Group, analysts believe Autohome is more attractive than Hello Group.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hello Group has a beta of 0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.872%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.53%. Hello Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hello Group pays out 48.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are smaller than Hello Group quarterly revenues of $373.6M. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than Hello Group's net income of $62.8M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while Hello Group's PE ratio is 7.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.21x versus 0.92x for Hello Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of 22.57%. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 9.91%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.86%. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.49 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.001%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.53%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are smaller than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $979.8M. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is lower than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $221.1M. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 22.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.21x versus 4.83x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WiMi Hologram Cloud has a net margin of 26.48% compared to Autohome's net margin of --. Autohome's return on equity of 7.43% beat WiMi Hologram Cloud's return on equity of -44.29%.

Autohome has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.86%. On the other hand WiMi Hologram Cloud has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 560.38%. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud has higher upside potential than Autohome, analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud is more attractive than Autohome.

Autohome has a beta of 0.200, which suggesting that the stock is 79.959% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WiMi Hologram Cloud has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autohome has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.53%. WiMi Hologram Cloud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome pays 24.15% of its earnings as a dividend. WiMi Hologram Cloud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than WiMi Hologram Cloud quarterly revenues of --. Autohome's net income of $65.6M is higher than WiMi Hologram Cloud's net income of --. Notably, Autohome's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while WiMi Hologram Cloud's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome is 3.21x versus 1.16x for WiMi Hologram Cloud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.