ATHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Tower has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of 11.66%. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.28% beat China Tower's return on equity of --.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.59, signalling upside risk potential of 26.63%. On the other hand China Tower has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Tower, analysts believe Autohome, Inc. is more attractive than China Tower.

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Tower has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.603%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. China Tower offers a yield of 48.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower pays out 57.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $248.4M, which are smaller than China Tower quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $52.3M is lower than China Tower's net income of $394.3M. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while China Tower's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.67x versus 186.34x for China Tower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of --. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.28% beat China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04%.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.59, signalling upside risk potential of 26.63%. On the other hand China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Autohome, Inc. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.567, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.313%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays out 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $248.4M, which are larger than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $52.3M is higher than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.67x versus 0.21x for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQIYI, Inc. has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of -3.7%. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.28% beat iQIYI, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.87%.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.59, signalling upside risk potential of 26.63%. On the other hand iQIYI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.37 which suggests that it could grow by 31.53%. Given that iQIYI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autohome, Inc., analysts believe iQIYI, Inc. is more attractive than Autohome, Inc..

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI, Inc. has a beta of 0.085, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.455%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. iQIYI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $248.4M, which are smaller than iQIYI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $933.6M. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $52.3M is higher than iQIYI, Inc.'s net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.32x while iQIYI, Inc.'s PE ratio is 178.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.67x versus 0.46x for iQIYI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.