ATHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bilibili, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of 6.18%. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.04% beat Bilibili, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.17%.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.93, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand Bilibili, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.70 which suggests that it could grow by 33.3%. Given that Bilibili, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autohome, Inc., analysts believe Bilibili, Inc. is more attractive than Autohome, Inc..

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.203, which suggesting that the stock is 79.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili, Inc. has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.748%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.42%. Bilibili, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $206.2M, which are smaller than Bilibili, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $30.5M is lower than Bilibili, Inc.'s net income of $72.5M. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while Bilibili, Inc.'s PE ratio is 62.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.26x versus 2.43x for Bilibili, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Tower has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of 11.66%. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.04% beat China Tower's return on equity of --.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.93, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand China Tower has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Tower, analysts believe Autohome, Inc. is more attractive than China Tower.

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.203, which suggesting that the stock is 79.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Tower has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.603%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.42%. China Tower offers a yield of 48.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower pays out 57.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $206.2M, which are smaller than China Tower quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $30.5M is lower than China Tower's net income of $394.3M. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while China Tower's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.26x versus 186.34x for China Tower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of --. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.04% beat China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04%.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.93, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autohome, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Autohome, Inc. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.203, which suggesting that the stock is 79.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.56%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.42%. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays out 45.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $206.2M, which are larger than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $30.5M is higher than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.26x versus 0.18x for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQIYI, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Autohome, Inc.'s net margin of -0.11%. Autohome, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.04% beat iQIYI, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.53%.

Autohome, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.93, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand iQIYI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.10 which suggests that it could grow by 50.79%. Given that iQIYI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autohome, Inc., analysts believe iQIYI, Inc. is more attractive than Autohome, Inc..

Autohome, Inc. has a beta of 0.203, which suggesting that the stock is 79.704% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI, Inc. has a beta of 0.259, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.132%.

Autohome, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.42%. iQIYI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autohome, Inc. pays 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autohome, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autohome, Inc. quarterly revenues are $206.2M, which are smaller than iQIYI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $958.2M. Autohome, Inc.'s net income of $30.5M is higher than iQIYI, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Autohome, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.54x while iQIYI, Inc.'s PE ratio is 178.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autohome, Inc. is 2.26x versus 0.36x for iQIYI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.