Financhill
Buy
63

AOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$9.69
Seasonality move :
-0.42%
Day range:
$9.64 - $9.70
52-week range:
$6.99 - $9.75
Dividend yield:
12.09%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
337.7K
Avg. volume:
526.5K
1-year change:
10.88%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
$9.1M
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AOD
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- -- -- -- --
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
-- -- -- -- --
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- -- -- -- --
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
-- -- -- -- --
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
-- -- -- -- --
RGLO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AOD
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
$9.68 -- -- -- $0.10 12.09% --
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
$120.05 -- -- -- $1.18 2.34% --
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
$11.51 -- -- -- $0.12 11.47% --
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
$7.76 -- -- -- $0.07 9.99% --
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
$142.29 -- -- -- $1.43 2.69% --
RGLO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
$29.55 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AOD
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- 1.000 -- --
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
-- 0.532 -- --
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- 1.449 -- --
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
-- 1.288 -- --
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
-- 0.928 -- --
RGLO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AOD
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
RGLO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AOD or ACWV?

    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
    ACWV
    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOD or ACWV?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, analysts believe abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
    ACWV
    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOD or ACWV More Risky?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.259%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOD or ACWV?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.09%. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOD or ACWV?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
    ACWV
    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOD or AGD?

    abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of -- beat abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
    AGD
    abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOD or AGD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has higher upside potential than abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund, analysts believe abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is more attractive than abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
    AGD
    abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AOD or AGD More Risky?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.948%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOD or AGD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.09%. abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund offers a yield of 11.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOD or AGD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of -- is lower than abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is -- versus -- for abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
    AGD
    abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOD or GLQ?

    Clough Global Equity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of -- beat Clough Global Equity Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
    GLQ
    Clough Global Equity Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOD or GLQ?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clough Global Equity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has higher upside potential than Clough Global Equity Fund, analysts believe abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is more attractive than Clough Global Equity Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
    GLQ
    Clough Global Equity Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is AOD or GLQ More Risky?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clough Global Equity Fund has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.549%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOD or GLQ?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.09%. Clough Global Equity Fund offers a yield of 9.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clough Global Equity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOD or GLQ?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clough Global Equity Fund quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of -- is lower than Clough Global Equity Fund's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clough Global Equity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is -- versus -- for Clough Global Equity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
    GLQ
    Clough Global Equity Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOD or QWLD?

    SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of -- beat SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
    QWLD
    SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOD or QWLD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has higher upside potential than SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF, analysts believe abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is more attractive than SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
    QWLD
    SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOD or QWLD More Risky?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.133%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOD or QWLD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.09%. SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOD or QWLD?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of -- is lower than SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is -- versus -- for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
    QWLD
    SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AOD or RGLO?

    Russell Investments Global Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net margin of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's return on equity of -- beat Russell Investments Global Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- --
    RGLO
    Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AOD or RGLO?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Russell Investments Global Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has higher upside potential than Russell Investments Global Equity ETF, analysts believe abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is more attractive than Russell Investments Global Equity ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    0 0 0
    RGLO
    Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is AOD or RGLO More Risky?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Russell Investments Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AOD or RGLO?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.09%. Russell Investments Global Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russell Investments Global Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AOD or RGLO?

    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Russell Investments Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's net income of -- is lower than Russell Investments Global Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Russell Investments Global Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund is -- versus -- for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AOD
    abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
    -- -- -- --
    RGLO
    Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 93.62% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 1.46% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 1.2% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock