Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
50
ACWV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$119.85
Seasonality move
:
2.37%
Day range:
$118.69 - $120.17
52-week range:
$104.94 - $125.28
Dividend yield:
2.06%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
58.6K
Avg. volume:
158.6K
1-year change:
3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
$119.90 | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 | 2.06% | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
$139.44 | -- | -- | -- | $1.24 | 1.58% | -- |
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
$30.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 1.47% | -- |
|
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
|
$30.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.99% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$181.72 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 1.52% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.395 | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | 0.579 | -- | -- |
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | 0.411 | -- | -- |
|
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
|
-- | 0.569 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 0.526 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACWV or ACWI?
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACWV or ACWI?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACWV or ACWI More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.974%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACWV or ACWI?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACWV or ACWI?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACWV or CZAR?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACWV or CZAR?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Themes Natural Monopoly ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is more attractive than Themes Natural Monopoly ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACWV or CZAR More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACWV or CZAR?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACWV or CZAR?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -- CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACWV or KLMT?
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- KLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACWV or KLMT?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 KLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACWV or KLMT More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACWV or KLMT?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACWV or KLMT?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -- KLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACWV or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACWV or URTH?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACWV or URTH More Risky?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.481%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACWV or URTH?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACWV or URTH?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
