Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
37
CZAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.16
Seasonality move
:
-0.84%
Day range:
$32.14 - $32.14
52-week range:
$26.29 - $32.97
Dividend yield:
0.84%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
375
1-year change:
5.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
$32.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0.84% | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
$141.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.96 | 1.43% | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
$231.91 | -- | -- | -- | $1.71 | 1.71% | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
$85.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.83 | 1.67% | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
$138.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.93 | 1.39% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$186.25 | -- | -- | -- | $1.26 | 1.27% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | 1.035 | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | 1.099 | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | 1.123 | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | 0.897 | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | 1.132 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 1.135 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or ACWI?
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or ACWI More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or ACWI?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or CRBN?
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or CRBN More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.419%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or CRBN?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- CRBNiShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or SDG?
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or SDG More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.499%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or SDG?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- SDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or TOK?
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or TOK More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.361%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or URTH More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.81%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 176.02% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is up 0.37% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 1.81% over the past day.
