Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
28
CZAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.96
Seasonality move
:
10.13%
Day range:
$28.86 - $28.96
52-week range:
$25.37 - $30.59
Dividend yield:
0.93%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
409
1-year change:
11.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
$28.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0.93% | -- |
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
$110.20 | -- | -- | -- | $1.63 | 2.31% | -- |
|
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
|
$103.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 1.05% | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
$118.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.99 | 1.62% | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
$158.77 | -- | -- | -- | $1.10 | 1.44% | -- |
|
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF
|
$119.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.88 | 1.92% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.584 | -- | -- |
|
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
|
-- | 0.553 | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | 0.654 | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | 0.715 | -- | -- |
|
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.761 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or ACWV?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or ACWV?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or ACWV More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or ACWV?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or ACWV?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or IOO?
iShares Global 100 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global 100 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- IOOiShares Global 100 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or IOO?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global 100 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global 100 ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares Global 100 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 IOOiShares Global 100 ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or IOO More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global 100 ETF has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.996%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or IOO?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. iShares Global 100 ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global 100 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or IOO?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global 100 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global 100 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global 100 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global 100 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- IOOiShares Global 100 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or TOK?
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or TOK More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or TOK?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- TOKiShares MSCI Kokusai ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or URTH?
iShares MSCI World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI World ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI World ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI World ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 URTHiShares MSCI World ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or URTH More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI World ETF has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.514%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. iShares MSCI World ETF offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or URTH?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI World ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI World ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- URTHiShares MSCI World ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CZAR or VT?
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net margin of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CZAR or VT?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF, analysts believe Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF0 0 0 VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is CZAR or VT More Risky?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.934%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CZAR or VT?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CZAR or VT?
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Natural Monopoly ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CZARThemes Natural Monopoly ETF-- -- -- -- VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 11.44% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.75% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.05% over the past day.
