OGEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of -49.65%. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 257.14%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 34.9%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.362%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 1.10x versus 0.07x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nanoviricides has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of --. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 257.14%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.46%. Given that Nanoviricides has higher upside potential than Oragenics, analysts believe Nanoviricides is more attractive than Oragenics.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.225%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 1.10x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of -2357.27%. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 257.14%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 785.18%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Oragenics, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Oragenics.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.66%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 1.10x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of --. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 257.14%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 419.93%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Oragenics, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Oragenics.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.945%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 1.10x versus 1.59x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.