Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Buy
58
ZMSB.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.65
Seasonality move
:
-0.06%
Day range:
$29.55 - $29.55
52-week range:
$28.46 - $29.90
Dividend yield:
3.38%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2K
Avg. volume:
447
1-year change:
1.48%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZMSB.TO
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUBD.TO
CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAF.TO
Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZMSB.TO
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series
|
$29.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 3.38% | -- |
|
CUBD.TO
CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD
|
$20.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.34% | -- |
|
HAF.TO
Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
$6.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.93% | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
$9.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.3% | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
$16.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.27% | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
$17.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZMSB.TO
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series
|
-- | 0.591 | -- | -- |
|
CUBD.TO
CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | 0.657 | -- | -- |
|
HAF.TO
Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 1.166 | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.098 | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.570 | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.659 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZMSB.TO
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUBD.TO
CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAF.TO
Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILGB.TO
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD.TO
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZMSB.TO or CUBD.TO?
CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net margin of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- CUBD.TOCI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZMSB.TO or CUBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has higher upside potential than CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD, analysts believe BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is more attractive than CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series0 0 0 CUBD.TOCI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD0 0 0 -
Is ZMSB.TO or CUBD.TO More Risky?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.216% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZMSB.TO or CUBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZMSB.TO or CUBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD quarterly revenues of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD's net income of --. Notably, BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is -- versus -- for CI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- -- CUBD.TOCI Global Unconstrained Bond Fund ETF CAD-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZMSB.TO or HAF.TO?
Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net margin of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- HAF.TOGlobal X Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZMSB.TO or HAF.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has higher upside potential than Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is more attractive than Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series0 0 0 HAF.TOGlobal X Active Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZMSB.TO or HAF.TO More Risky?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.216% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZMSB.TO or HAF.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZMSB.TO or HAF.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is -- versus -- for Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- -- HAF.TOGlobal X Active Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZMSB.TO or ILGB.TO?
IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net margin of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZMSB.TO or ILGB.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has higher upside potential than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF, analysts believe BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is more attractive than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series0 0 0 ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZMSB.TO or ILGB.TO More Risky?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.216% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZMSB.TO or ILGB.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZMSB.TO or ILGB.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is -- versus -- for IA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- -- ILGB.TOIA Clarington Loomis Global Multisector Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZMSB.TO or PBD.TO?
Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net margin of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZMSB.TO or PBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has higher upside potential than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF, analysts believe BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is more attractive than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series0 0 0 PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZMSB.TO or PBD.TO More Risky?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.216% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Total Return Bond ETF has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZMSB.TO or PBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Total Return Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZMSB.TO or PBD.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Total Return Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is -- versus -- for Purpose Total Return Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- -- PBD.TOPurpose Total Return Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZMSB.TO or XSI.TO?
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net margin of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZMSB.TO or XSI.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has higher upside potential than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is more attractive than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series0 0 0 XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZMSB.TO or XSI.TO More Risky?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.216% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZMSB.TO or XSI.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.38%. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZMSB.TO or XSI.TO?
BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series is -- versus -- for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZMSB.TOBMO Sustainable Glbl Multi-Sector Bond ETF Series-- -- -- -- XSI.TOiShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Buy
60
ZBIO alert for Dec 23
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
Buy
54
UNF alert for Dec 23
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.
