ZUMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Zumiez's net margin of -9.82%. Zumiez's return on equity of -0.52% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.22%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 389.18%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Zumiez, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Zumiez.

Zumiez has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.669%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 51.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Zumiez's net income of $14.8M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.26x versus 0.03x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Torrid Holdings has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Zumiez's net margin of -1.08%. Zumiez's return on equity of -0.52% beat Torrid Holdings's return on equity of --.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.22%. On the other hand Torrid Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.36 which suggests that it could fall by -1.83%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Torrid Holdings, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

Zumiez has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Torrid Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Torrid Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are larger than Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues of $275.6M. Zumiez's net income of $14.8M is higher than Torrid Holdings's net income of -$3M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Torrid Holdings's PE ratio is 34.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.26x versus 0.52x for Torrid Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Zumiez's net margin of 8.3%. Zumiez's return on equity of -0.52% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.6%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.22%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 81.35%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Zumiez, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Zumiez.

Zumiez has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.336%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $775.5M. Zumiez's net income of $14.8M is lower than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of $64.3M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.26x versus 0.21x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Zumiez's net margin of 7.35%. Zumiez's return on equity of -0.52% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Zumiez has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.22%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that Zumiez has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Zumiez is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Zumiez has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.282%.

Zumiez has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zumiez pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zumiez quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Zumiez's net income of $14.8M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Zumiez's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zumiez is 0.26x versus 0.88x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.