ZENV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nvni Group has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of --. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat Nvni Group's return on equity of --.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.58, signalling downside risk potential of -2.51%. On the other hand Nvni Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -39.47%. Given that Nvni Group has more downside risk than Zenvia, analysts believe Zenvia is more attractive than Nvni Group.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nvni Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nvni Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nvni Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are larger than Nvni Group quarterly revenues of --. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is higher than Nvni Group's net income of --. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nvni Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.43x versus -- for Nvni Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PagSeguro Digital has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of 23.5%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat PagSeguro Digital's return on equity of 14.61%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.58, signalling downside risk potential of -2.51%. On the other hand PagSeguro Digital has an analysts' consensus of $15.94 which suggests that it could grow by 83.38%. Given that PagSeguro Digital has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe PagSeguro Digital is more attractive than Zenvia.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagSeguro Digital has a beta of 1.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.971%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagSeguro Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagSeguro Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are smaller than PagSeguro Digital quarterly revenues of $407.3M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is lower than PagSeguro Digital's net income of $95.7M. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PagSeguro Digital's PE ratio is 5.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.43x versus 1.13x for PagSeguro Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Totvs SA has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of 21.88%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat Totvs SA's return on equity of 12.67%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.58, signalling downside risk potential of -2.51%. On the other hand Totvs SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zenvia has higher upside potential than Totvs SA, analysts believe Zenvia is more attractive than Totvs SA.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Totvs SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Totvs SA offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA pays out 56.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are smaller than Totvs SA quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is lower than Totvs SA's net income of $52.4M. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Totvs SA's PE ratio is 22.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.43x versus 2.77x for Totvs SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of -1.23%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.58, signalling downside risk potential of -2.51%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.39%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Zenvia.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.43x versus 0.32x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.