ZENV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

WM Technology has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of 4.93%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat WM Technology's return on equity of 6.89%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.4%. On the other hand WM Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 141.67%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Zenvia.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.223%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WM Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology pays out 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are larger than WM Technology quarterly revenues of $47.7M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is higher than WM Technology's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WM Technology's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.34x versus 0.57x for WM Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PagSeguro Digital has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of 11.97%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat PagSeguro Digital's return on equity of 14.97%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.4%. On the other hand PagSeguro Digital has an analysts' consensus of $10.62 which suggests that it could grow by 14.98%. Given that Zenvia has higher upside potential than PagSeguro Digital, analysts believe Zenvia is more attractive than PagSeguro Digital.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagSeguro Digital has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagSeguro Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagSeguro Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are smaller than PagSeguro Digital quarterly revenues of $856.3M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is lower than PagSeguro Digital's net income of $102.5M. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PagSeguro Digital's PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.34x versus 0.87x for PagSeguro Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Totvs SA has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of 13.37%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat Totvs SA's return on equity of 14.02%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.4%. On the other hand Totvs SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zenvia has higher upside potential than Totvs SA, analysts believe Zenvia is more attractive than Totvs SA.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Totvs SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Totvs SA offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA pays out 36.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Totvs SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are smaller than Totvs SA quarterly revenues of $236.9M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is lower than Totvs SA's net income of $31.7M. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Totvs SA's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.34x versus 3.97x for Totvs SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Zenvia's net margin of -1.23%. Zenvia's return on equity of -4.96% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Zenvia has a consensus price target of $1.71, signalling upside risk potential of 31.4%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 103.13%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Zenvia, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Zenvia.

Zenvia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Zenvia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zenvia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zenvia quarterly revenues are $51.3M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Zenvia's net income of $9.5M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Zenvia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zenvia is 0.34x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.