WAFD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BB&T has a net margin of 18.72% compared to WaFd, Inc.'s net margin of --. WaFd, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat BB&T's return on equity of --.

WaFd, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand BB&T has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WaFd, Inc. has higher upside potential than BB&T, analysts believe WaFd, Inc. is more attractive than BB&T.

WaFd, Inc. has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BB&T has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WaFd, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. BB&T offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WaFd, Inc. pays 40.61% of its earnings as a dividend. BB&T pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WaFd, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WaFd, Inc. quarterly revenues are $342.9M, which are larger than BB&T quarterly revenues of --. WaFd, Inc.'s net income of $64.2M is higher than BB&T's net income of --. Notably, WaFd, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while BB&T's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WaFd, Inc. is 1.89x versus -- for BB&T. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pathward Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 18.72% compared to WaFd, Inc.'s net margin of 20.24%. WaFd, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Pathward Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.35%.

WaFd, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Pathward Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $100.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.48%. Given that Pathward Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than WaFd, Inc., analysts believe Pathward Financial, Inc. is more attractive than WaFd, Inc..

WaFd, Inc. has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

WaFd, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Pathward Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. WaFd, Inc. pays 40.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial, Inc. pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WaFd, Inc. quarterly revenues are $342.9M, which are larger than Pathward Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $175M. WaFd, Inc.'s net income of $64.2M is higher than Pathward Financial, Inc.'s net income of $35.4M. Notably, WaFd, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Pathward Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WaFd, Inc. is 1.89x versus 2.62x for Pathward Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a net margin of 18.72% compared to WaFd, Inc.'s net margin of 22.68%. WaFd, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

WaFd, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Columbia Banking System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.58 which suggests that it could grow by 2.57%. Given that Columbia Banking System, Inc. has higher upside potential than WaFd, Inc., analysts believe Columbia Banking System, Inc. is more attractive than WaFd, Inc..

WaFd, Inc. has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Banking System, Inc. has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.588%.

WaFd, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Columbia Banking System, Inc. offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. WaFd, Inc. pays 40.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Banking System, Inc. pays out 63.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WaFd, Inc. quarterly revenues are $342.9M, which are smaller than Columbia Banking System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $948M. WaFd, Inc.'s net income of $64.2M is lower than Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s net income of $215M. Notably, WaFd, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Columbia Banking System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WaFd, Inc. is 1.89x versus 2.36x for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hancock Whitney Corp. has a net margin of 18.72% compared to WaFd, Inc.'s net margin of 24.41%. WaFd, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Hancock Whitney Corp.'s return on equity of 11.16%.

WaFd, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Hancock Whitney Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $77.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Hancock Whitney Corp. has higher upside potential than WaFd, Inc., analysts believe Hancock Whitney Corp. is more attractive than WaFd, Inc..

WaFd, Inc. has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hancock Whitney Corp. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.549%.

WaFd, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Hancock Whitney Corp. offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. WaFd, Inc. pays 40.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Hancock Whitney Corp. pays out 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WaFd, Inc. quarterly revenues are $342.9M, which are smaller than Hancock Whitney Corp. quarterly revenues of $514.4M. WaFd, Inc.'s net income of $64.2M is lower than Hancock Whitney Corp.'s net income of $125.6M. Notably, WaFd, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Hancock Whitney Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WaFd, Inc. is 1.89x versus 3.03x for Hancock Whitney Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.