VITL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 8.25% compared to Vital Farms, Inc.'s net margin of -7120.24%. Vital Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.84% beat AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.01%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.70, signalling upside risk potential of 69.1%. On the other hand AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.96%. Given that Vital Farms, Inc. has higher upside potential than AquaBounty Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Vital Farms, Inc. is more attractive than AquaBounty Technologies, Inc..

Vital Farms, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.357, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.733%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Farms, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues are $198.9M, which are larger than AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Vital Farms, Inc.'s net income of $16.4M is higher than AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Vital Farms, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.84x while AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms, Inc. is 2.03x versus 106.89x for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 8.25% compared to Vital Farms, Inc.'s net margin of 21.58%. Vital Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.84% beat Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.62%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.70, signalling upside risk potential of 69.1%. On the other hand Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $98.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.01%. Given that Vital Farms, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., analysts believe Vital Farms, Inc. is more attractive than Cal-Maine Foods, Inc..

Vital Farms, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.237, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.294%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 10.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Vital Farms, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues are $198.9M, which are smaller than Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $922.6M. Vital Farms, Inc.'s net income of $16.4M is lower than Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s net income of $199.1M. Notably, Vital Farms, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.84x while Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms, Inc. is 2.03x versus 0.94x for Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limoneira Co. has a net margin of 8.25% compared to Vital Farms, Inc.'s net margin of -1.96%. Vital Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.84% beat Limoneira Co.'s return on equity of -4.69%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.70, signalling upside risk potential of 69.1%. On the other hand Limoneira Co. has an analysts' consensus of $24.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.02%. Given that Limoneira Co. has higher upside potential than Vital Farms, Inc., analysts believe Limoneira Co. is more attractive than Vital Farms, Inc..

Vital Farms, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limoneira Co. has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.47%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limoneira Co. offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Vital Farms, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira Co. pays out 74.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Limoneira Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues are $198.9M, which are larger than Limoneira Co. quarterly revenues of $47.5M. Vital Farms, Inc.'s net income of $16.4M is higher than Limoneira Co.'s net income of -$932K. Notably, Vital Farms, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.84x while Limoneira Co.'s PE ratio is 39.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms, Inc. is 2.03x versus 1.53x for Limoneira Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International, Inc. has a net margin of 8.25% compared to Vital Farms, Inc.'s net margin of 16.21%. Vital Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.84% beat Village Farms International, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.77%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a consensus price target of $53.70, signalling upside risk potential of 69.1%. On the other hand Village Farms International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.92 which suggests that it could grow by 36.57%. Given that Vital Farms, Inc. has higher upside potential than Village Farms International, Inc., analysts believe Vital Farms, Inc. is more attractive than Village Farms International, Inc..

Vital Farms, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International, Inc. has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.421%.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Farms, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues are $198.9M, which are larger than Village Farms International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Vital Farms, Inc.'s net income of $16.4M is higher than Village Farms International, Inc.'s net income of $10.8M. Notably, Vital Farms, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.84x while Village Farms International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Farms, Inc. is 2.03x versus 1.44x for Village Farms International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.