UG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 20.34% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of -14.74%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 28.06% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $75.05 which suggests that it could grow by 35.89%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.016%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.57%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $4B. United-Guardian's net income of $503.7K is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.51x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.08x versus 1.31x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 20.34% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of -0.44%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 28.06% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 5.91%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of $35.88 which suggests that it could grow by 20.35%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.202%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.57%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $478.4M. United-Guardian's net income of $503.7K is higher than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.51x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.08x versus 0.66x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 20.34% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 6.7%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 28.06% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.75%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $169.75 which suggests that it could grow by 59.99%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.259%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.57%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $361.5M. United-Guardian's net income of $503.7K is lower than Interparfums's net income of $24.2M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.51x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.08x versus 2.35x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 20.34% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 21.16%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 28.06% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $176.89 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.491% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.57%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. United-Guardian's net income of $503.7K is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.51x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.08x versus 4.88x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.