UDMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chegg has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Udemy's net margin of -14.4%. Udemy's return on equity of -29.83% beat Chegg's return on equity of -225.39%.

Udemy has a consensus price target of $9.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.75%. On the other hand Chegg has an analysts' consensus of $0.83 which suggests that it could fall by -27.01%. Given that Udemy has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Udemy is more attractive than Chegg.

Udemy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chegg has a beta of 1.780, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.986%.

Udemy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chegg offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Udemy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chegg pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Udemy quarterly revenues are $200.3M, which are larger than Chegg quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Udemy's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Chegg's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Udemy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chegg's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Udemy is 1.31x versus 0.25x for Chegg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coursera has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Udemy's net margin of -4.35%. Udemy's return on equity of -29.83% beat Coursera's return on equity of -11.03%.

Udemy has a consensus price target of $9.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.75%. On the other hand Coursera has an analysts' consensus of $9.69 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that Udemy has higher upside potential than Coursera, analysts believe Udemy is more attractive than Coursera.

Udemy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coursera has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Udemy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coursera offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Udemy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coursera pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Udemy quarterly revenues are $200.3M, which are larger than Coursera quarterly revenues of $179.3M. Udemy's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Coursera's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Udemy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coursera's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Udemy is 1.31x versus 1.86x for Coursera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visionary Holdings has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Udemy's net margin of --. Udemy's return on equity of -29.83% beat Visionary Holdings's return on equity of 5.98%.

Udemy has a consensus price target of $9.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.75%. On the other hand Visionary Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Udemy has higher upside potential than Visionary Holdings, analysts believe Udemy is more attractive than Visionary Holdings.

Udemy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visionary Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Udemy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Visionary Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Udemy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visionary Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Udemy quarterly revenues are $200.3M, which are larger than Visionary Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Udemy's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Visionary Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Udemy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Visionary Holdings's PE ratio is 6.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Udemy is 1.31x versus 0.92x for Visionary Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Legacy Education has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Udemy's net margin of 15.17%. Udemy's return on equity of -29.83% beat Legacy Education's return on equity of 24.19%.

Udemy has a consensus price target of $9.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.75%. On the other hand Legacy Education has an analysts' consensus of $10.40 which suggests that it could fall by -5.88%. Given that Udemy has higher upside potential than Legacy Education, analysts believe Udemy is more attractive than Legacy Education.

Udemy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legacy Education has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Udemy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legacy Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Udemy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legacy Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Udemy quarterly revenues are $200.3M, which are larger than Legacy Education quarterly revenues of $18.6M. Udemy's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Legacy Education's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Udemy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Legacy Education's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Udemy is 1.31x versus 2.27x for Legacy Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.