GV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Legacy Education has a net margin of -- compared to Visionary Holdings's net margin of 14.93%. Visionary Holdings's return on equity of 5.98% beat Legacy Education's return on equity of 28.47%.

Visionary Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Legacy Education has an analysts' consensus of $9.80 which suggests that it could grow by 32.61%. Given that Legacy Education has higher upside potential than Visionary Holdings, analysts believe Legacy Education is more attractive than Visionary Holdings.

Visionary Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legacy Education has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Visionary Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legacy Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visionary Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legacy Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visionary Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Legacy Education quarterly revenues of $14M. Visionary Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Legacy Education's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Visionary Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.43x while Legacy Education's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visionary Holdings is 0.50x versus 1.68x for Legacy Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SNDL has a net margin of -- compared to Visionary Holdings's net margin of -8.16%. Visionary Holdings's return on equity of 5.98% beat SNDL's return on equity of -8.76%.

Visionary Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SNDL has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 78.41%. Given that SNDL has higher upside potential than Visionary Holdings, analysts believe SNDL is more attractive than Visionary Holdings.

Visionary Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SNDL has a beta of 3.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 218.525%.

Visionary Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SNDL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visionary Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SNDL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visionary Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SNDL quarterly revenues of $173.6M. Visionary Holdings's net income of -- is lower than SNDL's net income of -$14.2M. Notably, Visionary Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.43x while SNDL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visionary Holdings is 0.50x versus 0.71x for SNDL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Udemy has a net margin of -- compared to Visionary Holdings's net margin of -12.93%. Visionary Holdings's return on equity of 5.98% beat Udemy's return on equity of -33.04%.

Visionary Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Udemy has an analysts' consensus of $12.27 which suggests that it could grow by 41.31%. Given that Udemy has higher upside potential than Visionary Holdings, analysts believe Udemy is more attractive than Visionary Holdings.

Visionary Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Udemy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Visionary Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Udemy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visionary Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Udemy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visionary Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Udemy quarterly revenues of $195.4M. Visionary Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Udemy's net income of -$25.3M. Notably, Visionary Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.43x while Udemy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visionary Holdings is 0.50x versus 1.56x for Udemy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -- compared to Visionary Holdings's net margin of -0.98%. Visionary Holdings's return on equity of 5.98% beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -16.15%.

Visionary Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $2.28 which suggests that it could grow by 195.41%. Given that Village Farms International has higher upside potential than Visionary Holdings, analysts believe Village Farms International is more attractive than Visionary Holdings.

Visionary Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.903%.

Visionary Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visionary Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visionary Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Visionary Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Village Farms International's net income of -$820K. Notably, Visionary Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.43x while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visionary Holdings is 0.50x versus 0.26x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.