TW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 41.37% compared to Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 3.45%. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.85% beat Cohen & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Cohen & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Co., Inc., analysts believe Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Cohen & Co., Inc..

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.481% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.029%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Cohen & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Tradeweb Markets, Inc. pays 17.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Co., Inc. pays out -22.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $508.6M, which are larger than Cohen & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $254.4M. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net income of $210.4M is higher than Cohen & Co., Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.37x while Cohen & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is 11.16x versus 0.23x for Cohen & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a net margin of 41.37% compared to Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 17.32%. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.85% beat The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.82%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $930.80 which suggests that it could fall by -2.5%. Given that Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., analysts believe Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc..

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.481% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.221%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.00 per share. Tradeweb Markets, Inc. pays 17.16% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. pays out 27.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $508.6M, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $26.7B. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net income of $210.4M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.6B. Notably, Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.37x while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is 11.16x versus 2.50x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a net margin of 41.37% compared to Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 43.37%. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.85% beat Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $149.29 which suggests that it could grow by 40.51%. Given that Robinhood Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tradeweb Markets, Inc., analysts believe Robinhood Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Tradeweb Markets, Inc..

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.481% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Robinhood Markets, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tradeweb Markets, Inc. pays 17.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $508.6M, which are smaller than Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net income of $210.4M is lower than Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M. Notably, Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.37x while Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is 11.16x versus 22.90x for Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 41.37% compared to Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 43.31%. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.85% beat Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.54%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $127.08, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $80.22 which suggests that it could grow by 3.9%. Given that Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., analysts believe Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc..

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.481% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.914%.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tradeweb Markets, Inc. pays 17.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. pays out 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tradeweb Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $508.6M, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s net income of $210.4M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Tradeweb Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.37x while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tradeweb Markets, Inc. is 11.16x versus 3.29x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.