Financhill
Sell
42

TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$133.14
Seasonality move :
3.16%
Day range:
$132.34 - $133.25
52-week range:
$128.16 - $218.42
Dividend yield:
1.79%
P/E ratio:
34.25x
P/S ratio:
8.14x
P/B ratio:
5.10x
Volume:
429.9K
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
-18.16%
Market cap:
$60B
Revenue:
$7.3B
EPS (TTM):
$3.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp.
$2.1B $1.24 4.93% -18.06% $180.73
CASS
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
$49.7M $0.64 -9.94% 91.1% $47.00
CTAS
Cintas Corp.
$2.8B $1.23 7.97% 9.53% $213.94
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
$115.9M -$0.08 -17.61% -39.5% $6.88
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
$39M -- -37.62% -- --
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
$88.3M $0.57 21.32% 37.52% $103.67
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp.
$133.21 $180.73 $60B 34.25x $0.60 1.79% 8.14x
CASS
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
$42.30 $47.00 $553.5M 18.18x $0.32 2.96% 2.75x
CTAS
Cintas Corp.
$191.14 $213.94 $77B 41.36x $0.45 0.88% 7.24x
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
$5.26 $6.88 $175.6M 24.22x $0.07 6.65% 0.32x
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
$0.77 -- $18.4M 2.60x $0.00 0% 0.12x
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
$58.87 $103.67 $549.1M 48.42x $0.00 0% 1.82x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp.
17.04% 0.123 3.45% 0.47x
CASS
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
1.89% 0.278 0.91% 0.23x
CTAS
Cintas Corp.
42.08% 0.669 4.32% 0.81x
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
10.94% 0.448 16.27% 2.96x
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
61.26% 1.834 107.12% 1.08x
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
33.34% 0.075 21.64% 1.94x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp.
$438M $438M 11.86% 14.51% 24.58% $547.6M
CASS
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
$48.1M $11.6M 11.33% 11.61% 21.15% $11.3M
CTAS
Cintas Corp.
$1.4B $655.7M 25.67% 41.56% 23.42% $425M
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
$45.9M -$1.7M -60.64% -66.17% -1.41% -$8.3M
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
$7.3M -$1.9M -46.35% -91.7% -4.59% -$4.6M
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
$26.8M $4M 3.18% 3.98% 4.86% $8.4M

Thomson Reuters Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or CASS?

    Cass Information Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of 17.06%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.51% beat Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    24.58% $0.94 $14.2B
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems, Inc.
    89.1% $0.68 $248.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $180.73, signalling upside risk potential of 35.67%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.38%. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Cass Information Systems, Inc., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Cass Information Systems, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    10 3 0
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is TRI or CASS More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.433%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Cass Information Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems, Inc. pays out 86.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Cass Information Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54M. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $428M is higher than Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s net income of $9.2M. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.25x while Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 8.14x versus 2.75x for Cass Information Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    8.14x 34.25x $1.8B $428M
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems, Inc.
    2.75x 18.18x $54M $9.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or CTAS?

    Cintas Corp. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of 17.69%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.51% beat Cintas Corp.'s return on equity of 41.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    24.58% $0.94 $14.2B
    CTAS
    Cintas Corp.
    50.45% $1.21 $7.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $180.73, signalling upside risk potential of 35.67%. On the other hand Cintas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $213.94 which suggests that it could grow by 11.93%. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Cintas Corp., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Cintas Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    10 3 0
    CTAS
    Cintas Corp.
    5 12 2
  • Is TRI or CTAS More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas Corp. has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.606%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Cintas Corp. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas Corp. pays out 35.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Cintas Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $428M is lower than Cintas Corp.'s net income of $495.3M. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.25x while Cintas Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 8.14x versus 7.24x for Cintas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    8.14x 34.25x $1.8B $428M
    CTAS
    Cintas Corp.
    7.24x 41.36x $2.8B $495.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or RGP?

    Resources Connection, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of -2%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.51% beat Resources Connection, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    24.58% $0.94 $14.2B
    RGP
    Resources Connection, Inc.
    38.2% -$0.07 $231.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $180.73, signalling upside risk potential of 35.67%. On the other hand Resources Connection, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.7%. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Resources Connection, Inc., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Resources Connection, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    10 3 0
    RGP
    Resources Connection, Inc.
    2 1 0
  • Is TRI or RGP More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection, Inc. has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.246%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Resources Connection, Inc. offers a yield of 6.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection, Inc. pays out 9.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Resources Connection, Inc. quarterly revenues of $120.2M. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $428M is higher than Resources Connection, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.25x while Resources Connection, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 8.14x versus 0.32x for Resources Connection, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    8.14x 34.25x $1.8B $428M
    RGP
    Resources Connection, Inc.
    0.32x 24.22x $120.2M -$2.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or SGRP?

    SPAR Group, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of -21.16%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.51% beat SPAR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -91.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    24.58% $0.94 $14.2B
    SGRP
    SPAR Group, Inc.
    17.59% -$0.37 $42.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $180.73, signalling upside risk potential of 35.67%. On the other hand SPAR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 811.46%. Given that SPAR Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters Corp., analysts believe SPAR Group, Inc. is more attractive than Thomson Reuters Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    10 3 0
    SGRP
    SPAR Group, Inc.
    1 0 0
  • Is TRI or SGRP More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.092, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.827%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. SPAR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SPAR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $428M is higher than SPAR Group, Inc.'s net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.25x while SPAR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 8.14x versus 0.12x for SPAR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    8.14x 34.25x $1.8B $428M
    SGRP
    SPAR Group, Inc.
    0.12x 2.60x $41.4M -$8.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or TRNS?

    Transcat, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of 1.54%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.51% beat Transcat, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    24.58% $0.94 $14.2B
    TRNS
    Transcat, Inc.
    32.53% $0.14 $443.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or TRNS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $180.73, signalling upside risk potential of 35.67%. On the other hand Transcat, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $103.67 which suggests that it could grow by 76.11%. Given that Transcat, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters Corp., analysts believe Transcat, Inc. is more attractive than Thomson Reuters Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    10 3 0
    TRNS
    Transcat, Inc.
    3 1 0
  • Is TRI or TRNS More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.165% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat, Inc. has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.07%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or TRNS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Transcat, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or TRNS?

    Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Transcat, Inc. quarterly revenues of $82.3M. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $428M is higher than Transcat, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.25x while Transcat, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 8.14x versus 1.82x for Transcat, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corp.
    8.14x 34.25x $1.8B $428M
    TRNS
    Transcat, Inc.
    1.82x 48.42x $82.3M $1.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock