THRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.82%. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.69% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 70.85%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 194.87%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $276.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.79%. Given that Thryv Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Thryv Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.33%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Thryv Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $201.6M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings, Inc. is 0.22x versus 4.11x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 18.5%. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.69% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 194.87%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $354.11 which suggests that it could grow by 56.01%. Given that Thryv Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Thryv Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.621%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $201.6M, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings, Inc. is 0.22x versus 7.13x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -10112%. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.69% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.11%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 194.87%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $394.38 which suggests that it could grow by 200.94%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thryv Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Thryv Holdings, Inc..

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.541, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.081%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $201.6M, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $123M. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of -$12.4B. Notably, Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings, Inc. is 0.22x versus 80.50x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PAR Technology Corp. has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -15.25%. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.69% beat PAR Technology Corp.'s return on equity of -10.83%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.5000, signalling upside risk potential of 194.87%. On the other hand PAR Technology Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $59.11 which suggests that it could grow by 170.28%. Given that Thryv Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PAR Technology Corp., analysts believe Thryv Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PAR Technology Corp..

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PAR Technology Corp. has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.783%.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PAR Technology Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PAR Technology Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $201.6M, which are larger than PAR Technology Corp. quarterly revenues of $119.2M. Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is higher than PAR Technology Corp.'s net income of -$18.2M. Notably, Thryv Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.56x while PAR Technology Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings, Inc. is 0.22x versus 1.97x for PAR Technology Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.