SYNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -15.14%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 53.78%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $99.69 which suggests that it could grow by 56.77%. Given that Lumentum Holdings has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Lumentum Holdings is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.121%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 2.51x versus 3.07x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -868.86%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 53.78%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 108.66%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.627%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 2.51x versus 27.22x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -6726.52%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -168.4%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 53.78%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 92.06%. Given that Rigetti Computing has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$153M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 2.51x versus 133.69x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -27.9%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 53.78%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Stratasys.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.121%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are larger than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 2.51x versus 1.21x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.