SOWG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hershey Co. has a net margin of -704.11% compared to Sow Good, Inc.'s net margin of 8.69%. Sow Good, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.3% beat The Hershey Co.'s return on equity of 29.97%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1128.88%. On the other hand The Hershey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $189.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.73%. Given that Sow Good, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Hershey Co., analysts believe Sow Good, Inc. is more attractive than The Hershey Co..

Sow Good, Inc. has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hershey Co. has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.526%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hershey Co. offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Sow Good, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey Co. pays out 50.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hershey Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sow Good, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than The Hershey Co. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sow Good, Inc.'s net income of -$10.9M is lower than The Hershey Co.'s net income of $276.3M. Notably, Sow Good, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.38x while The Hershey Co.'s PE ratio is 27.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good, Inc. is 1.02x versus 3.23x for The Hershey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. has a net margin of -704.11% compared to Sow Good, Inc.'s net margin of -9.7%. Sow Good, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.3% beat Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.'s return on equity of -58.82%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1128.88%. On the other hand Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1018.01%. Given that Sow Good, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., analysts believe Sow Good, Inc. is more attractive than Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc..

Sow Good, Inc. has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.253%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sow Good, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sow Good, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8M. Sow Good, Inc.'s net income of -$10.9M is lower than Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.'s net income of -$662K. Notably, Sow Good, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.38x while Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good, Inc. is 1.02x versus 0.41x for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of -704.11% compared to Sow Good, Inc.'s net margin of -480.68%. Sow Good, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.3% beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Sow Good, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1128.88%. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2621.09%. Given that Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sow Good, Inc., analysts believe Splash Beverage Group, Inc. is more attractive than Sow Good, Inc..

Sow Good, Inc. has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sow Good, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sow Good, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Sow Good, Inc.'s net income of -$10.9M is lower than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Sow Good, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.38x while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good, Inc. is 1.02x versus 2.65x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -704.11% compared to Sow Good, Inc.'s net margin of 15.32%. Sow Good, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.3% beat Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.58%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1128.88%. On the other hand Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sow Good, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., analysts believe Sow Good, Inc. is more attractive than Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc..

Sow Good, Inc. has a beta of 1.797, which suggesting that the stock is 79.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.439, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.09%.

Sow Good, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Sow Good, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. pays out 29.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sow Good, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.7M. Sow Good, Inc.'s net income of -$10.9M is lower than Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.'s net income of $35.6M. Notably, Sow Good, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.38x while Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good, Inc. is 1.02x versus 3.77x for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.