SOWG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Branchout Food has a net margin of -95.1% compared to Sow Good's net margin of -58.25%. Sow Good's return on equity of 9.87% beat Branchout Food's return on equity of -214.9%.

Sow Good has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 75.72%. On the other hand Branchout Food has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sow Good has higher upside potential than Branchout Food, analysts believe Sow Good is more attractive than Branchout Food.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.866, which suggesting that the stock is 86.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Branchout Food has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sow Good has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Branchout Food offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sow Good pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Branchout Food pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sow Good quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than Branchout Food quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Sow Good's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Branchout Food's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Sow Good's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Branchout Food's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good is 0.67x versus 1.41x for Branchout Food. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Right On Brands has a net margin of -95.1% compared to Sow Good's net margin of --. Sow Good's return on equity of 9.87% beat Right On Brands's return on equity of --.

Sow Good has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 75.72%. On the other hand Right On Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sow Good has higher upside potential than Right On Brands, analysts believe Sow Good is more attractive than Right On Brands.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.866, which suggesting that the stock is 86.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Right On Brands has a beta of 2.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.354%.

Sow Good has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Right On Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sow Good pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Right On Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sow Good quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than Right On Brands quarterly revenues of --. Sow Good's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Right On Brands's net income of --. Notably, Sow Good's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Right On Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good is 0.67x versus 0.87x for Right On Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of -95.1% compared to Sow Good's net margin of --. Sow Good's return on equity of 9.87% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Sow Good has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 75.72%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sow Good has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Sow Good is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.866, which suggesting that the stock is 86.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.378%.

Sow Good has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sow Good pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sow Good quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Sow Good's net income of -$3.4M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Sow Good's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good is 0.67x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -95.1% compared to Sow Good's net margin of 3.7%. Sow Good's return on equity of 9.87% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Sow Good has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 75.72%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $104.88 which suggests that it could grow by 24.97%. Given that Sow Good has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, analysts believe Sow Good is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings.

Sow Good has a beta of 1.866, which suggesting that the stock is 86.607% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

Sow Good has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Sow Good pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sow Good quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Sow Good's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Sow Good's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sow Good is 0.67x versus 0.86x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.