SJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iQIYI, Inc. has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of -3.7%. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat iQIYI, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.87%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 236.13%. On the other hand iQIYI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.36 which suggests that it could grow by 15.67%. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than iQIYI, Inc., analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than iQIYI, Inc..

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI, Inc. has a beta of 0.030, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.019%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iQIYI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are smaller than iQIYI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $933.6M. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is higher than iQIYI, Inc.'s net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while iQIYI, Inc.'s PE ratio is 178.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.28x versus 0.52x for iQIYI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Token Cat Ltd. has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat Token Cat Ltd.'s return on equity of -350.08%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 236.13%. On the other hand Token Cat Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35570.61%. Given that Token Cat Ltd. has higher upside potential than Scienjoy Holding Corp., analysts believe Token Cat Ltd. is more attractive than Scienjoy Holding Corp..

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Token Cat Ltd. has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.91%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Token Cat Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Token Cat Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are larger than Token Cat Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is higher than Token Cat Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Token Cat Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.28x versus 0.23x for Token Cat Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of 26.14%. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 14.47%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 236.13%. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $26.78 which suggests that it could grow by 59.4%. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Tencent Music Entertainment Group, analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than Tencent Music Entertainment Group.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.866, which suggesting that the stock is 13.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.816%.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 29.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are smaller than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is lower than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $309.1M. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 17.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.28x versus 5.93x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.