Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
60
SJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.34
Seasonality move
:
-13.13%
Day range:
$1.34 - $1.48
52-week range:
$0.45 - $1.58
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
27.27x
P/S ratio:
0.34x
P/B ratio:
0.35x
Volume:
50.9K
Avg. volume:
101.8K
1-year change:
67.36%
Market cap:
$61M
Revenue:
$186.8M
EPS (TTM):
$0.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $4.00 |
|
AOAO
Alpha One
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHWRF
China Tower
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
|
$969.5M | $0.01 | -2.88% | -63.63% | $2.37 |
|
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
|
$1.2B | $0.23 | 19.35% | -39.56% | $26.98 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corp.
|
$1.44 | $4.00 | $61M | 27.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
|
AOAO
Alpha One
|
$1.5400 | -- | $118.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CHWRF
China Tower
|
$1.41 | -- | $24.7B | 17.54x | $0.15 | 48.4% | 186.34x |
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
$14.20 | -- | $3.9B | 6.90x | $0.76 | 5.36% | 0.19x |
|
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
|
$1.71 | $2.37 | $1.6B | 178.69x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
|
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
|
$14.74 | $26.98 | $22.7B | 15.29x | $0.18 | 2.15% | 5.21x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corp.
|
1.28% | -1.384 | 8.96% | 4.33x |
|
AOAO
Alpha One
|
-- | 0.851 | -- | -- |
|
CHWRF
China Tower
|
-- | -0.764 | -- | -- |
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
1.53% | 0.581 | -- | 1.01x |
|
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
|
52.5% | 0.019 | 84.04% | 0.30x |
|
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
|
4.46% | 0.865 | 1.49% | 1.81x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corp.
|
$7.8M | $1.3M | 0.53% | 0.54% | 3.08% | -- |
|
AOAO
Alpha One
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHWRF
China Tower
|
-- | -- | 4.18% | -- | 15.37% | -- |
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 7.89% | 8.04% | -- | -- |
|
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
|
$169.8M | -$17M | -1.35% | -2.87% | -1.82% | -$36.8M |
|
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
|
$514.4M | $331.3M | 13.49% | 14.47% | 28.02% | $514M |
Scienjoy Holding Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SJ or AOAO?
Alpha One has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat Alpha One's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SJScienjoy Holding Corp.18.08% $0.02 $171.9M AOAOAlpha One-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SJ or AOAO?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 177.77%. On the other hand Alpha One has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Alpha One, analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than Alpha One.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SJScienjoy Holding Corp.1 0 0 AOAOAlpha One0 0 0 -
Is SJ or AOAO More Risky?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alpha One has a beta of -4.072, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 507.231%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SJ or AOAO?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alpha One offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alpha One pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SJ or AOAO?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are larger than Alpha One quarterly revenues of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is higher than Alpha One's net income of --. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.27x while Alpha One's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.34x versus -- for Alpha One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SJScienjoy Holding Corp.0.34x 27.27x $43.1M $728K AOAOAlpha One-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SJ or CHWRF?
China Tower has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of 11.66%. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat China Tower's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SJScienjoy Holding Corp.18.08% $0.02 $171.9M CHWRFChina Tower-- $0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About SJ or CHWRF?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 177.77%. On the other hand China Tower has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than China Tower, analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than China Tower.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SJScienjoy Holding Corp.1 0 0 CHWRFChina Tower0 0 0 -
Is SJ or CHWRF More Risky?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Tower has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.603%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SJ or CHWRF?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Tower offers a yield of 48.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower pays out 57.98% of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SJ or CHWRF?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are smaller than China Tower quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is lower than China Tower's net income of $394.3M. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.27x while China Tower's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.34x versus 186.34x for China Tower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SJScienjoy Holding Corp.0.34x 27.27x $43.1M $728K CHWRFChina Tower186.34x 17.54x $3.4B $394.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SJ or CUCSY?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SJScienjoy Holding Corp.18.08% $0.02 $171.9M CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.-- -- $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SJ or CUCSY?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 177.77%. On the other hand China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SJScienjoy Holding Corp.1 0 0 CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SJ or CUCSY More Risky?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.018%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SJ or CUCSY?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays out 35.14% of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SJ or CUCSY?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are larger than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is higher than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.27x while China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.34x versus 0.19x for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SJScienjoy Holding Corp.0.34x 27.27x $43.1M $728K CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0.19x 6.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SJ or IQ?
iQIYI, Inc. has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of -3.7%. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat iQIYI, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SJScienjoy Holding Corp.18.08% $0.02 $171.9M IQiQIYI, Inc.18.19% -$0.04 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SJ or IQ?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 177.77%. On the other hand iQIYI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.37 which suggests that it could grow by 38.28%. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than iQIYI, Inc., analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than iQIYI, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SJScienjoy Holding Corp.1 0 0 IQiQIYI, Inc.7 10 1 -
Is SJ or IQ More Risky?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQIYI, Inc. has a beta of 0.085, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.455%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SJ or IQ?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iQIYI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iQIYI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SJ or IQ?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are smaller than iQIYI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $933.6M. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is higher than iQIYI, Inc.'s net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.27x while iQIYI, Inc.'s PE ratio is 178.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.34x versus 0.44x for iQIYI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SJScienjoy Holding Corp.0.34x 27.27x $43.1M $728K IQiQIYI, Inc.0.44x 178.69x $933.6M -$34.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SJ or TME?
Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net margin of 26.14%. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 0.54% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 14.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SJScienjoy Holding Corp.18.08% $0.02 $171.9M TMETencent Music Entertainment Group43.51% $0.19 $12.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SJ or TME?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 177.77%. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $26.98 which suggests that it could grow by 83.06%. Given that Scienjoy Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Tencent Music Entertainment Group, analysts believe Scienjoy Holding Corp. is more attractive than Tencent Music Entertainment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SJScienjoy Holding Corp.1 0 0 TMETencent Music Entertainment Group22 2 0 -
Is SJ or TME More Risky?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.903, which suggesting that the stock is 9.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.178%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SJ or TME?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Scienjoy Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 29.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SJ or TME?
Scienjoy Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $43.1M, which are smaller than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s net income of $728K is lower than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $309.1M. Notably, Scienjoy Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.27x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scienjoy Holding Corp. is 0.34x versus 5.21x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SJScienjoy Holding Corp.0.34x 27.27x $43.1M $728K TMETencent Music Entertainment Group5.21x 15.29x $1.2B $309.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
