Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
24
CUCSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.45
Seasonality move
:
10.15%
Day range:
$12.45 - $12.45
52-week range:
$10.46 - $17.63
Dividend yield:
6.12%
P/E ratio:
6.90x
P/S ratio:
0.16x
P/B ratio:
0.77x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
170
1-year change:
19.02%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$20.8B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRKR
36Kr Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TC
Token Cat Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
$12.45 | -- | $3.4B | 6.90x | $0.76 | 6.12% | 0.16x |
|
CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
|
$1.25 | -- | $111.6M | 0.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.
|
$1.23 | -- | $2.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
KRKR
36Kr Holdings, Inc.
|
$4.70 | -- | $9.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
|
TC
Token Cat Ltd.
|
$7.14 | -- | $12.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
1.53% | 0.349 | -- | 1.01x |
|
CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
|
2.74% | 2.567 | -- | 7.36x |
|
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.
|
5.21% | 0.596 | 3.38% | 1.65x |
|
KRKR
36Kr Holdings, Inc.
|
7.81% | 3.241 | 22.18% | 1.08x |
|
TC
Token Cat Ltd.
|
128.3% | 2.452 | -- | 0.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUCSY
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 7.89% | 8.04% | -- | -- |
|
CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 6.79% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.
|
$16K | -$153K | -52.2% | -54.79% | -8.91% | -$492.1K |
|
KRKR
36Kr Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -90.93% | -75% | -- | -- |
|
TC
Token Cat Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -210.69% | -350.08% | -- | -- |
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CUCSY or CHR?
Cheer Holding, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04% beat Cheer Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.-- -- $6.5B CHRCheer Holding, Inc.-- -- $331.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CUCSY or CHR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheer Holding, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 299900%. Given that Cheer Holding, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Cheer Holding, Inc. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 CHRCheer Holding, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CUCSY or CHR More Risky?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 129.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheer Holding, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.4%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUCSY or CHR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. Cheer Holding, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays 35.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheer Holding, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUCSY or CHR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cheer Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Cheer Holding, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Cheer Holding, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. is 0.16x versus 0.00x for Cheer Holding, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0.16x 6.90x -- -- CHRCheer Holding, Inc.0.00x 0.01x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUCSY or CNET?
ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -6.29%. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04% beat ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.-- -- $6.5B CNETZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.0.93% -$0.04 $3.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CUCSY or CNET?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc., analysts believe China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 CNETZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CUCSY or CNET More Risky?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 129.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.488%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUCSY or CNET?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays 35.14% of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUCSY or CNET?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$108K. Notably, China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. is 0.16x versus 0.48x for ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0.16x 6.90x -- -- CNETZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.0.48x -- $1.7M -$108K
-
Which has Higher Returns CUCSY or KRKR?
36Kr Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04% beat 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.-- -- $6.5B KRKR36Kr Holdings, Inc.-- -- $17.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CUCSY or KRKR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2449.11%. Given that 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe 36Kr Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 KRKR36Kr Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CUCSY or KRKR More Risky?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 129.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.888%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUCSY or KRKR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. 36Kr Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays 35.14% of its earnings as a dividend. 36Kr Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUCSY or KRKR?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 36Kr Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. is 0.16x versus 0.32x for 36Kr Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0.16x 6.90x -- -- KRKR36Kr Holdings, Inc.0.32x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUCSY or TC?
Token Cat Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04% beat Token Cat Ltd.'s return on equity of -350.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.-- -- $6.5B TCToken Cat Ltd.-- -- $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CUCSY or TC?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Token Cat Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50357.92%. Given that Token Cat Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Token Cat Ltd. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 TCToken Cat Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CUCSY or TC More Risky?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 129.023% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Token Cat Ltd. has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.393%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUCSY or TC?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.12%. Token Cat Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays 35.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Token Cat Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUCSY or TC?
China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Token Cat Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Token Cat Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Token Cat Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. is 0.16x versus 0.16x for Token Cat Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUCSYChina Communications Services Corp. Ltd.0.16x 6.90x -- -- TCToken Cat Ltd.0.16x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
