SIMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net margin of 19.49%. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's return on equity of 4.04% beat Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than SIM Acquisition Corp. I, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than SIM Acquisition Corp. I.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.06%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. SIM Acquisition Corp. I pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 84.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.4M. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net income of $2.3M is lower than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, SIM Acquisition Corp. I's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.22x while Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIM Acquisition Corp. I is -- versus 3.48x for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net margin of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's return on equity of 4.04% beat Graf Global Corp.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIM Acquisition Corp. I has higher upside potential than Graf Global Corp., analysts believe SIM Acquisition Corp. I is more attractive than Graf Global Corp..

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIM Acquisition Corp. I pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global Corp. quarterly revenues of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net income of $2.3M is higher than Graf Global Corp.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, SIM Acquisition Corp. I's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.22x while Graf Global Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIM Acquisition Corp. I is -- versus -- for Graf Global Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Legato Merger Corp. III has a net margin of -- compared to SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net margin of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's return on equity of 4.04% beat Legato Merger Corp. III's return on equity of 4.1%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Legato Merger Corp. III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIM Acquisition Corp. I has higher upside potential than Legato Merger Corp. III, analysts believe SIM Acquisition Corp. I is more attractive than Legato Merger Corp. III.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legato Merger Corp. III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legato Merger Corp. III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIM Acquisition Corp. I pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legato Merger Corp. III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Legato Merger Corp. III quarterly revenues of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net income of $2.3M is higher than Legato Merger Corp. III's net income of $2M. Notably, SIM Acquisition Corp. I's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.22x while Legato Merger Corp. III's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIM Acquisition Corp. I is -- versus -- for Legato Merger Corp. III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has a net margin of -- compared to SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net margin of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's return on equity of 4.04% beat Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's return on equity of -32.93%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIM Acquisition Corp. I has higher upside potential than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I, analysts believe SIM Acquisition Corp. I is more attractive than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trailblazer Merger Corp. I offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIM Acquisition Corp. I pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trailblazer Merger Corp. I pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIM Acquisition Corp. I quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I quarterly revenues of --. SIM Acquisition Corp. I's net income of $2.3M is higher than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, SIM Acquisition Corp. I's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.22x while Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's PE ratio is 266.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIM Acquisition Corp. I is -- versus -- for Trailblazer Merger Corp. I. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.