SHPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lixte Biotechnology Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net margin of --. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lixte Biotechnology Holdings's return on equity of --.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lixte Biotechnology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has higher upside potential than Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, analysts believe Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings is more attractive than Lixte Biotechnology Holdings.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lixte Biotechnology Holdings has a beta of -0.115, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.477%.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lixte Biotechnology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lixte Biotechnology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lixte Biotechnology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is lower than Lixte Biotechnology Holdings's net income of -$986K. Notably, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lixte Biotechnology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings is -- versus -- for Lixte Biotechnology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net margin of -49.65%. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 602.96%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.383%.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings is -- versus 0.06x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net margin of -2357.27%. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1656.38%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings is -- versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net margin of --. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $100.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7838.6%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.874%.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's net income of -$3.8M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings is -- versus 0.90x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.