SGML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -40.54% compared to Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -35.21% beat Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling downside risk potential of -16.99%. On the other hand Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sigma Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than Nuinsco Resources Ltd., analysts believe Sigma Lithium Corp. is more attractive than Nuinsco Resources Ltd..

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.025, which suggesting that the stock is 102.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuinsco Resources Ltd. has a beta of -1.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.266%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuinsco Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuinsco Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than Nuinsco Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$11.6M is lower than Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$67.4K. Notably, Sigma Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Nuinsco Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium Corp. is 12.34x versus -- for Nuinsco Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -40.54% compared to Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -35.21% beat Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -24.65%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling downside risk potential of -16.99%. On the other hand Rare Element Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 272.99%. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sigma Lithium Corp., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Sigma Lithium Corp..

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.025, which suggesting that the stock is 102.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.864%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$11.6M is lower than Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Sigma Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium Corp. is 12.34x versus -- for Rare Element Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC the metals co., Inc. has a net margin of -40.54% compared to Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -35.21% beat TMC the metals co., Inc.'s return on equity of -3890.83%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling downside risk potential of -16.99%. On the other hand TMC the metals co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that TMC the metals co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Sigma Lithium Corp., analysts believe TMC the metals co., Inc. is more attractive than Sigma Lithium Corp..

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.025, which suggesting that the stock is 102.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC the metals co., Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC the metals co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC the metals co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than TMC the metals co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$11.6M is higher than TMC the metals co., Inc.'s net income of -$184.5M. Notably, Sigma Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while TMC the metals co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium Corp. is 12.34x versus -- for TMC the metals co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winston Gold has a net margin of -40.54% compared to Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -35.21% beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling downside risk potential of -16.99%. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sigma Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Sigma Lithium Corp. is more attractive than Winston Gold.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a beta of -0.025, which suggesting that the stock is 102.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.542%.

Sigma Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sigma Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sigma Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Sigma Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$11.6M is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Sigma Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 81.98x while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sigma Lithium Corp. is 12.34x versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.