SELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net margin of 14.79%. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.25%. On the other hand Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.77%. Given that Global Self Storage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Global Self Storage, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Global Self Storage, Inc. pays 155.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays out 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Self Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net income of $485.4K is lower than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M. Notably, Global Self Storage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.91x while Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Self Storage, Inc. is 4.40x versus 6.74x for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.25%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.23%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Self Storage, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Global Self Storage, Inc..

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.482%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Self Storage, Inc. pays 155.08% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Self Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net income of $485.4K is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Global Self Storage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.91x while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Self Storage, Inc. is 4.40x versus 0.46x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sotherly Hotels, Inc. has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net margin of -14.55%. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Sotherly Hotels, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.94%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.25%. On the other hand Sotherly Hotels, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could fall by -54.02%. Given that Global Self Storage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sotherly Hotels, Inc., analysts believe Global Self Storage, Inc. is more attractive than Sotherly Hotels, Inc..

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sotherly Hotels, Inc. has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.289%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Sotherly Hotels, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Self Storage, Inc. pays 155.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Sotherly Hotels, Inc. pays out -683.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Self Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Sotherly Hotels, Inc. quarterly revenues of $38M. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net income of $485.4K is higher than Sotherly Hotels, Inc.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Global Self Storage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.91x while Sotherly Hotels, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Self Storage, Inc. is 4.40x versus 0.24x for Sotherly Hotels, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Properties Trust has a net margin of 15.05% compared to Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net margin of -9.82%. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -36.01%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 25.25%. On the other hand Service Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 51.93%. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Global Self Storage, Inc., analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than Global Self Storage, Inc..

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.826%.

Global Self Storage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Service Properties Trust offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Global Self Storage, Inc. pays 155.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust pays out 36.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Self Storage, Inc.'s is not.

Global Self Storage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $478.3M. Global Self Storage, Inc.'s net income of $485.4K is higher than Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M. Notably, Global Self Storage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.91x while Service Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Self Storage, Inc. is 4.40x versus 0.16x for Service Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.