SDST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enovix has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of -522.03%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Enovix's return on equity of -112.38%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 260.83%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 118.7%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Enovix, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Enovix.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enovix quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Enovix's net income of -$22.5M. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 102.29x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of -485622.38%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -59.68%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 260.83%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63.17%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Ideal Power, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.312%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $550. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 449.94x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of -121.55%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 260.83%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.73 which suggests that it could fall by -13.3%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Plug Power.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.196%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 3.39x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of 0.72%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 260.83%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 84.94%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Ultralife.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.582%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 13.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 0.76x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.