SDST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ESS Tech, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power, Inc.'s net margin of -4848.13%. Stardust Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat ESS Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -343.16%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 473.37%. On the other hand ESS Tech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Stardust Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than ESS Tech, Inc., analysts believe Stardust Power, Inc. is more attractive than ESS Tech, Inc..

Stardust Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESS Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESS Tech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESS Tech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ESS Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $214K. Stardust Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is higher than ESS Tech, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M. Notably, Stardust Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ESS Tech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power, Inc. is -- versus 4.75x for ESS Tech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power, Inc.'s net margin of -205.31%. Stardust Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 473.37%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 25.03%. Given that Stardust Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Plug Power, Inc., analysts believe Stardust Power, Inc. is more attractive than Plug Power, Inc..

Stardust Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.116%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Stardust Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Stardust Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power, Inc. is -- versus 3.42x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power, Inc.'s net margin of -29.5%. Stardust Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Tecogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.73%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 473.37%. On the other hand Tecogen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Stardust Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tecogen, Inc., analysts believe Stardust Power, Inc. is more attractive than Tecogen, Inc..

Stardust Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen, Inc. has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.097%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tecogen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Stardust Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is lower than Tecogen, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Stardust Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tecogen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power, Inc. is -- versus 6.58x for Tecogen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power, Inc.'s net margin of -2.88%. Stardust Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ultralife Corp.'s return on equity of 1.27%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 473.37%. On the other hand Ultralife Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 147.79%. Given that Stardust Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ultralife Corp., analysts believe Stardust Power, Inc. is more attractive than Ultralife Corp..

Stardust Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife Corp. has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.416%.

Stardust Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ultralife Corp. quarterly revenues of $43.4M. Stardust Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is lower than Ultralife Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Stardust Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife Corp.'s PE ratio is 54.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power, Inc. is -- versus 0.51x for Ultralife Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.