Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Buy
72
RUNN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.70
Seasonality move
:
4.31%
Day range:
$33.77 - $34.05
52-week range:
$28.60 - $35.12
Dividend yield:
0.55%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
26.5K
Avg. volume:
39.3K
1-year change:
2.32%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
|
$33.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.55% | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
$56.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.19% | -- |
|
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
|
$70.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.3% | -- |
|
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
|
$36.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.58% | -- |
|
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
|
$163.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.75 | 1.48% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.673 | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.085 | -- | -- |
|
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.713 | -- | -- |
|
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
|
-- | 1.351 | -- | -- |
|
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.865 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RUNN or BUL?
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net margin of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RUNN or BUL?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF, analysts believe Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is more attractive than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF0 0 0 BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is RUNN or BUL More Risky?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUNN or BUL?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RUNN or BUL?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- -- BULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RUNN or CWS?
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net margin of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- CWSAdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RUNN or CWS?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has higher upside potential than AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF, analysts believe Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is more attractive than AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF0 0 0 CWSAdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is RUNN or CWS More Risky?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUNN or CWS?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RUNN or CWS?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is -- versus -- for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- -- CWSAdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RUNN or OPTZ?
Optimize Strategy Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net margin of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Optimize Strategy Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- OPTZOptimize Strategy Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RUNN or OPTZ?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Optimize Strategy Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Optimize Strategy Index ETF, analysts believe Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is more attractive than Optimize Strategy Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF0 0 0 OPTZOptimize Strategy Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is RUNN or OPTZ More Risky?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optimize Strategy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUNN or OPTZ?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Optimize Strategy Index ETF offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optimize Strategy Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RUNN or OPTZ?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Optimize Strategy Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Optimize Strategy Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optimize Strategy Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Optimize Strategy Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- -- OPTZOptimize Strategy Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RUNN or SIZE?
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net margin of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- SIZEiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RUNN or SIZE?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF, analysts believe Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF0 0 0 SIZEiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is RUNN or SIZE More Risky?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RUNN or SIZE?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RUNN or SIZE?
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RUNNRunning Oak Efficient Growth ETF-- -- -- -- SIZEiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 5.08% over the past day.
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.1% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.44% over the past day.
