RUM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -125.87% compared to Rumble's net margin of -6.7%. Rumble's return on equity of -59.7% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Rumble has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.23%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Rumble.

Rumble has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Rumble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumble quarterly revenues are $25.1M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Rumble's net income of -$31.5M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Rumble's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumble is 17.04x versus 1.20x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -125.87% compared to Rumble's net margin of 37.61%. Rumble's return on equity of -59.7% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Rumble has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Rumble.

Rumble has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Rumble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Rumble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rumble quarterly revenues are $25.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Rumble's net income of -$31.5M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Rumble's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumble is 17.04x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MicroStrategy has a net margin of -125.87% compared to Rumble's net margin of -293.07%. Rumble's return on equity of -59.7% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

Rumble has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.42%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Rumble.

Rumble has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

Rumble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumble quarterly revenues are $25.1M, which are smaller than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Rumble's net income of -$31.5M is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, Rumble's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumble is 17.04x versus 151.04x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phunware has a net margin of -125.87% compared to Rumble's net margin of -415.04%. Rumble's return on equity of -59.7% beat Phunware's return on equity of -289.92%.

Rumble has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand Phunware has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 226.92%. Given that Phunware has higher upside potential than Rumble, analysts believe Phunware is more attractive than Rumble.

Rumble has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phunware has a beta of 2.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.174%.

Rumble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phunware offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phunware pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumble quarterly revenues are $25.1M, which are larger than Phunware quarterly revenues of $665K. Rumble's net income of -$31.5M is lower than Phunware's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Rumble's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Phunware's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumble is 17.04x versus 8.30x for Phunware. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.