ROAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Construction Partners, Inc.'s net margin of 11.9%. Construction Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.86% beat Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.3%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,150.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, Inc., analysts believe Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is more attractive than Construction Partners, Inc..

Construction Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.986%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Construction Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays out 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $899.8M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Construction Partners, Inc.'s net income of $56.6M is lower than Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M. Notably, Construction Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.40x while Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners, Inc. is 2.20x versus 4.12x for Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction, Inc. has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Construction Partners, Inc.'s net margin of 7.63%. Construction Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.86% beat Granite Construction, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.93%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.3%. On the other hand Granite Construction, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.20 which suggests that it could grow by 9.88%. Given that Construction Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, Inc., analysts believe Construction Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Granite Construction, Inc..

Construction Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction, Inc. has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.954%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction, Inc. offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Construction Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction, Inc. pays out 21.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $899.8M, which are smaller than Granite Construction, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Construction Partners, Inc.'s net income of $56.6M is lower than Granite Construction, Inc.'s net income of $109.4M. Notably, Construction Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.40x while Granite Construction, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners, Inc. is 2.20x versus 1.42x for Granite Construction, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Construction Partners, Inc.'s net margin of 4.49%. Construction Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.86% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.3%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $476.63 which suggests that it could grow by 9.52%. Given that Construction Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Construction Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Construction Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.106%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Construction Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $899.8M, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Construction Partners, Inc.'s net income of $56.6M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Construction Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.40x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners, Inc. is 2.20x versus 2.42x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.29% compared to Construction Partners, Inc.'s net margin of -36.08%. Construction Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.86% beat Southland Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -60.76%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.3%. On the other hand Southland Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 80.95%. Given that Southland Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, Inc., analysts believe Southland Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Construction Partners, Inc..

Construction Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.549% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Construction Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $899.8M, which are larger than Southland Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $213.3M. Construction Partners, Inc.'s net income of $56.6M is higher than Southland Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$77M. Notably, Construction Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 61.40x while Southland Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners, Inc. is 2.20x versus 0.20x for Southland Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.