Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
32
RNRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.55
Seasonality move
:
1.38%
Day range:
$33.34 - $33.45
52-week range:
$21.90 - $34.32
Dividend yield:
0.93%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5.8K
Avg. volume:
3K
1-year change:
26.7%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RNRG
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RNRG
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
|
$33.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.93% | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$19.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.34% | -- |
|
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
|
$37.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 2.01% | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
$38.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.18% | -- |
|
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
|
$282.88 | -- | -- | -- | $4.87 | 1.72% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RNRG
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.998 | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.710 | -- | -- |
|
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
|
-- | 1.200 | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | 0.824 | -- | -- |
|
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
|
-- | 1.193 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RNRG
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RNRG or AQWA?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RNRG or AQWA?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Clean Water ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Clean Water ETF, analysts believe Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than Global X Clean Water ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF0 0 0 AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 -
Is RNRG or AQWA More Risky?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNRG or AQWA?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Global X Clean Water ETF offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Clean Water ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RNRG or AQWA?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Clean Water ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Clean Water ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RNRG or CRAK?
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RNRG or CRAK?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF, analysts believe Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF0 0 0 CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF0 0 0 -
Is RNRG or CRAK More Risky?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.314%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNRG or CRAK?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. VanEck Oil Refiners ETF offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Oil Refiners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RNRG or CRAK?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- -- CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RNRG or EVX?
VanEck Environmental Services ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Environmental Services ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RNRG or EVX?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Environmental Services ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Environmental Services ETF, analysts believe Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than VanEck Environmental Services ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF0 0 0 EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF0 0 0 -
Is RNRG or EVX More Risky?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Environmental Services ETF has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.543%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNRG or EVX?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. VanEck Environmental Services ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Environmental Services ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RNRG or EVX?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Environmental Services ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Environmental Services ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Environmental Services ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Environmental Services ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- -- EVXVanEck Environmental Services ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RNRG or OIH?
VanEck Oil Services ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Oil Services ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- OIHVanEck Oil Services ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RNRG or OIH?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Oil Services ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Oil Services ETF, analysts believe Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than VanEck Oil Services ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF0 0 0 OIHVanEck Oil Services ETF0 0 0 -
Is RNRG or OIH More Risky?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Oil Services ETF has a beta of 0.982, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNRG or OIH?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. VanEck Oil Services ETF offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.87 per share. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Oil Services ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RNRG or OIH?
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Oil Services ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Oil Services ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Oil Services ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Oil Services ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF-- -- -- -- OIHVanEck Oil Services ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
