RGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 1.08% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 6.08%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.51%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.01%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $60.20 which suggests that it could grow by 13.28%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.962%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 64.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $401.6M. RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K is lower than Black Hills's net income of $24.4M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.44x versus 1.89x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 1.08% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 1.64%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of 11.23%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.01%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.63 which suggests that it could grow by 64.09%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.834%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out 132.14% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but New Fortress Energy's is not.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $567.5M. RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K is lower than New Fortress Energy's net income of $9.3M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.44x versus 1.01x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.08% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 5.92%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 3.38%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.01%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $9.20 which suggests that it could grow by 148.33%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 55.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $84M. RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K is lower than OPAL Fuels's net income of $5M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.44x versus 0.27x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 1.08% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 23.38%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.06% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.49%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.01%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $94.42 which suggests that it could grow by 8.76%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Sempra.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.169, which suggesting that the stock is 83.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.455%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Sempra offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 49.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $13.1M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $2.8B. RGC Resources's net income of $140.8K is lower than Sempra's net income of $649M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while Sempra's PE ratio is 19.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.44x versus 4.27x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.