Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
77
QB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.70
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$42.65 - $42.65
52-week range:
$39.83 - $42.70
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
6
Avg. volume:
1.1K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FB
Meta Platforms
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF
|
$42.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0% | -- |
|
FB
Meta Platforms
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
$80.48 | -- | -- | -- | $1.45 | 1.8% | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
$79.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.2% | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
$623.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 0.46% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FB
Meta Platforms
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.539 | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | 1.240 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FB
Meta Platforms
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QB or FB?
Meta Platforms has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's return on equity of -- beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- FBMeta Platforms-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QB or FB?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is more attractive than Meta Platforms.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF0 0 0 FBMeta Platforms0 0 0 -
Is QB or FB More Risky?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QB or FB?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QB or FB?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net income of -- is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is -- versus -- for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- -- FBMeta Platforms-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QB or PTNQ?
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QB or PTNQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is more attractive than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF0 0 0 PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF0 0 0 -
Is QB or PTNQ More Risky?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.746%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QB or PTNQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QB or PTNQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- -- PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QB or QQH?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's return on equity of -- beat HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QB or QQH?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has higher upside potential than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF, analysts believe ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is more attractive than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF0 0 0 QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is QB or QQH More Risky?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.789%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QB or QQH?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QB or QQH?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net income of -- is lower than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is -- versus -- for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QB or QQQ?
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net margin of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QB or QQQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, analysts believe ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is more attractive than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF0 0 0 QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 10 0 0 -
Is QB or QQQ More Risky?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.333%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QB or QQQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QB or QQQ?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QBProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF-- -- -- -- QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
