PSIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to PS International Group Ltd.'s net margin of -67%. PS International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.82% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -140.31%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PS International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe PS International Group Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..

PS International Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PS International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PS International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3M. PS International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, PS International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PS International Group Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.79x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to PS International Group Ltd.'s net margin of -3.76%. PS International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.82% beat Forward Air Corp.'s return on equity of -55.76%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forward Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.92%. Given that Forward Air Corp. has higher upside potential than PS International Group Ltd., analysts believe Forward Air Corp. is more attractive than PS International Group Ltd..

PS International Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air Corp. has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.828%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. PS International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PS International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forward Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $631.8M. PS International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Forward Air Corp.'s net income of -$23.8M. Notably, PS International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PS International Group Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.31x for Forward Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to PS International Group Ltd.'s net margin of 3.1%. PS International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.82% beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.81 which suggests that it could fall by -0.24%. Given that Hub Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than PS International Group Ltd., analysts believe Hub Group, Inc. is more attractive than PS International Group Ltd..

PS International Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.727%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. PS International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PS International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. PS International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, PS International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PS International Group Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.65x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to PS International Group Ltd.'s net margin of 0.56%. PS International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.82% beat Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.96%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Radiant Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 29.2%. Given that Radiant Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than PS International Group Ltd., analysts believe Radiant Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than PS International Group Ltd..

PS International Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.449%.

PS International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PS International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PS International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $226.7M. PS International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, PS International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PS International Group Ltd. is 0.38x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.