RRTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 7.71%. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.32%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 192.4%. On the other hand Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $140.47 which suggests that it could fall by -14.89%. Given that Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., analysts believe Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc..

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a beta of 4.271, which suggesting that the stock is 327.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.412%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. pays out 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s net income of $223.1M. Notably, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is 0.06x versus 2.03x for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -3.76%. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Forward Air Corp.'s return on equity of -55.76%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 192.4%. On the other hand Forward Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Forward Air Corp., analysts believe Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Forward Air Corp..

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a beta of 4.271, which suggesting that the stock is 327.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air Corp. has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.714%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forward Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $631.8M. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Forward Air Corp.'s net income of -$23.8M. Notably, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.36x for Forward Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 3.1%. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hub Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.21%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 192.4%. On the other hand Hub Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.73 which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hub Group, Inc., analysts believe Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Hub Group, Inc..

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a beta of 4.271, which suggesting that the stock is 327.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.378%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc. pays out 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hub Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $934.5M. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Hub Group, Inc.'s net income of $28.9M. Notably, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hub Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.68x for Hub Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RXO, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -3.13%. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat RXO, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.32%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 192.4%. On the other hand RXO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could fall by -8.61%. Given that Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than RXO, Inc., analysts believe Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is more attractive than RXO, Inc..

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a beta of 4.271, which suggesting that the stock is 327.091% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RXO, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RXO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RXO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RXO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than RXO, Inc.'s net income of -$46M. Notably, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RXO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.50x for RXO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.